The Defense Department via AARO basically just put the Pro-Disclosure lobby in check – the purpose of the report clearly is to bury and whitewash the UAPTF’s previous findings as disclosed to Congress under oath via closed “Whistleblower” hearings several years back: this new report basically calls the pro-disclosure lobby liars and challenges them to prove otherwise:
If they disclose classified evidence proving AARO wrong – they breach their national security oaths. If they continue telling the public stories without evidentiary substance – the AARO report effectively removes their agency as far as the general press and public are concerned…
In other words, check.
But it’s very far from check-mate…
Spin this on it’s head: since AARO’s report basically “proves” neither UFO’s as off-world technology and back engineering Special Access Programs don’t exist: basically any evidence to the contrary can’t exist either, therefore: it’s basically no longer classified.
Now, obviously a finding in favour of that requires the ruling of a court – all the way up to supreme court if necessary: but one can now, conceivably, mount a defense proving ones possession and release of previously “highly classified” material pertinent to the UAP Investigation are no longer legally classified (and therefore subject to penalty under NDA and the National Security Act) – simply via the expedient: the AARO Report proves they aren’t anything of the kind and have cleared discussion of such programs passed for open publication via said report.
UFO’s don’t exist, neither do reverse engineering program’s: so all you’re releasing to the public is proof of this, at least according to the Defense Department and AARO.
Obviously, this is wholly discursive – not legal advice – but it’s its a starting point by which to find the right kind of precedent to allow it.
Your thoughts…
submitted by /u/G-M-Dark
[link] [comments]