After the events of the SCIF, many Congressman mentioned compartmentalization

I found an interesting correlation in the reactions of congressman post scif after watching this compiled video of congressional reactions: https://twitter.com/UFOB_/status/1746144076385132829. We’ve long understood that compartmentalization, a tactic used in the Manhattan Project, enables extreme secrecy. It’s commonly said that many individuals in these programs don’t even know what they’re working on, much like many who worked on the Manhattan Project were unaware they were developing the first nuclear bombs. These claims and rumors, especially about compartmentalization in reverse engineering programs, have circulated for a while and have been repeatedly verified by numerous sources, including David Grusch.

Now, for the main point of my post. I believe, albeit perhaps obviously, that the congressmen were recently informed by the ICIG that Grusch’s assertions about reverse engineering programs are true. However, they were unable to obtain any specific details about these programs due to their compartmentalization and over-classification. Additionally, this SCIF meeting was convened to evaluate the credibility of Grusch’s claims (some of which they confirmed during the questioning). He has consistently claimed that reverse engineering programs exist and heavily rely on compartmentalization. This might explain why so many congressmen mentioned compartmentalization post-SCIF, a topic that, until now, hasn’t been a major focus of the UAP caucus.