As the Disclosure Process has progressed we’ve seen it move from videos of physical UAP’s witnessed by military personnel — which have yet to be debunked by AARO by the way — to Grusch’s allegations of secret government crash retrieval programs going back to the 1930’s. So I put those into two different categories of witnesses; the “witnesses” and the “whistleblowers”.
Dr. Kirkpatrick’s latest op-ed pieces now that he’s out the door from AARO focus on discrediting the whistleblower group. He claims their accounts eventually trace back to the secret paranormal research done at Skinwalker Ranch, which itself was conducted by veterans of psychic spying program Stargate. (Puthoff, Monroe Institute). I hate to agree with Kirkpatrick here, but it does appear that Grusch, Sheehan, Elizondo, Dolan and others involved with AATIP/AAWSAP/UAPTF are believers in and advocates for the efficacy of remote viewing and are relying on the remote viewing sessions conducted by Ingo Swan and Pat Price in the 1970’s and follow-programs.
This makes me wonder if we have two UAP secenarios to contend with here: The UAPs that continue to be seen by the public and pilots, and that show up on instruments, etc. — classic “nuts and bolts ufos” — and the issue of a secret remote viewing program within the US government that has developed a body of belief/knowledge concerning alien/NHI presence here on Earth and secret government programs; and that the problem Grusch and other whistleblowers have is that they either cannot or do not want to disclose that this information was derived from remote viewing. Instead, they may be attempting to get conventional investigations done to expose the secret government crash retrieval programs thus bypassing the credibility problem they would have with remote viewing sourced witness evidence. Hence, why we get claims of witnesses who will come forward eventually.
I note that of the UAPTF alumns Travis Taylor does not seem to be into remote viewing and of TTSA alumns it doesn’t seem Chris Mellon is either. To me they appear to be over on the “nuts and bolts UFOs” side of things emphasizing national defense and flight safety. I’m totally open to correction on this.
At any rate, a secret “Psychic Spy” program being revealed, or, remote viewing revealed to be a valid intelligence source, would be in itself news that politicians might want to not touch. For one thing, it’s scientifically controversial; for another, it’s religiously controversial.
submitted by /u/TwylaL
[link] [comments]