Eglin Google Search Discrepancies

Hey all, just wanted to share that while looking up the Eglin Case I became very interested in these two Google results.

I know there are other smoking gun actions that put disbelief on this incident not being UAP’s but I’m focusing strictly on the “balloon resolution”.

The one directly from AARO states that the military pilot who reported the incident says there were FOUR UAP’s and yet only took two photos of one of the crafts. Although, now the story was switched to being a light balloon. While I am not military, I can assume military vehicles are at least mildly inspected before use and the “inoperable video camera” does not make sense as a fighter jet having constant video seems as important as a Black Box.

If you look up how far a Helium balloon can travel the expected range is topped out at about 105,000ft and some change, from what I’ve read. Weather balloons can reach up to 60,000-100,000ft but they are not lit up by LED’s like a light balloon, and I cannot accurately find any information about how far light balloons can fly; but I can tell you they are completely covered in LED lights and the gas inside is Helium, and if you look at the official pictures, light only shows from the bottom.

Light balloons are perfectly round if they are spheres, and the picture of the supposed light balloon has a slight oblong shape, if you look up “commercial” light balloons you’ll see just two images of said object, while everything else is the round shape covered in lights. The two pictures are a close up with the bottom HALF and a long distant shot with a pinhole sized amount of light. What happened? Did most of the lights go out and with a tiny amount of lights somehow surviving being blown out? Low chance. The close up shot is clearly taken after the long shot due to looking much grainier. Commercial light balloons have a singular light across the bottom half so if the light went out there wouldn’t be a pinhole sized bit of light.

And guess what? The close up shot shows the bottom half lit up.

Not ONLY that, the pilot described the object as gray, paneled, with an ORANGE light emanating from the bottom, whereas light balloons are commonly rainbow or white. As he got closer his radar “malfunctioned”, so no video, no radar data, at the same time this object rose into the cloud cover which is around the time the pilot lost sight of it. There was also ”heat aura” emanating from them bottom that they described as”blurry air”, kinda like when you look at the asphalt in the summer time. Have you ever seen a balloon expel some sort of gas?

With distinct reflective and/or emissive properties in infrared. Blurry air, no smoke.

The pilot said this object was either moving very slowly or completely stationary. A balloon would float at a constant rate. So which is it? How does something be slow/stationary yet easily avoid you in the cloud cover

Weather balloons can reflect the sun, but the difference between a light balloon and a weather balloon is vastly different in the areas that have visible light exposure.

I still want know where the other three the pilot saw went. If they were light balloons would they not be in the same proximity and line of sight the whole time? Especially since they either moved “slowly” or not at all.

Also also, if you look up “Eglin UAP” on images you’ll get the couple of the supposed photos and then a bunch of random photos like a completely different UAP video, congressmen and military personnel, a U.S Fish and Wildlife post, some peoples LinkedIn profiles. You get the point. It just isn’t consistent, even if you look up a lawsuit or court case even those have a ton of pictures of the people involved.

I don’t know, man.

TL;DR: I think the balloon resolution for the Elgin Air Force Base UAP incident is a load of crap cop out excuse for another thing the U.S. Government can’t/doesn’t want to handle.