Every frame of the “portal” plus warping the vfx images matches (3d enviroment?)

Generate New Template

public (1567) , uap (1561) , disclosure (1383) , ufo (1296) , transparency (1220) , government (1066) , information (1011) , disinformation (943) , ufos (919) , campaign (862) , congress (769) , people (678) , phenomena (648) , national (632) , urge (586) , issue (565) , regarding (565) , unidentified (561) , security (538) , truth (506) , american (506) , support (503) , potential (498) , know (477) , trust (469) , uaps (467) , writing (462) , accountability (461) , time (424) , scientific (410) , intelligence (381) , understanding (370) , act (363) , rep (357) , members (354) , defense (331) , action (314) , efforts (311) , research (310) , committee (309) , objects (302) , related (301) , legislation (297) , house (290) , secrecy (288) , oversight (286) , template (283) , ndaa (282) , concern (280) , being (274) ,

It bothered me that the shape of the vfx was oh so close but still slightly wrong so I brought the stills into illustrator (don’t have photoshop on my pc) and perspective warped as well as I could and tried to line up each still from the pyro vfx with the FLIR video to get a better understanding on the it’s only one frame argument.

assumed this perspective purely by eye from the orb and plane position from vid

Frame by frame analysis

This would’ve been easier in blender in heindsight, but alas as you can see once the idea of rotating the vfx comes in. As it would if it was perpendicular to the planes body, the shapes align a LOT better…

I couldn’t replicate the outside line of frame 2 really unless it was stretched in parts unevenly. It also looks like its a combination of two frames from pyro vfx.

Some odd differences and similarities respectively.

Lastly the frame from the vfx jump back up to 7 from 4. So its not a simple reverse vfx added in, they really took their time…

Conclusion and tin hat speculation 🙂

After aligning the various frames and nitpicking perspective it seems pretty conclusive that the whole portal/implosion was in fact the claimed vfx. The fact that it required rotating the images axis’ leads me to believe it is more likely to be a 3d environment. Although that being said, it is possible that this type of perspective of the portal over existing footage could be done in after effects or a similar program in 2014 by someone. If, and this is a big if, the footage (pre portal and possibly orbs) was genuine that still raises the question of how did the hoaxer obtain the original footage and can it be found un-doctored. Thanks for reading

submitted by /u/Shlaboza
[link] [comments]  

Read More