Here’s why I think Grusch was “allowed” to make his claims, and why they cleared DOPSR.

Follow the timeline and connect the dots.

Grusch (who had whistleblower protections) got DOPSR approval for the Debrief article information on April 4th & 6th of 2023.

https://amendments-rules.house.gov/amendments/UAP%20Reporting%20Procedures220705122640993.pdf

https://thedebrief.org/intelligence-officials-say-u-s-has-retrieved-non-human-craft/

Then, the Schumer Amendment came out July 14th, 2023. A mere 3 months later.

https://www.democrats.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/uap_amendment.pdf

By that point in time:

Grusch had already gotten his whistleblower protections. Grusch had already testified to select members of congress about his work with the UAPTF (resulting in Schumer Amendment). 2 members of the Gang of Eight had sponsored the bill, and as such, understood the veracity of Grusch’s claims. As Karl Nell has stated – “these are the people in congress who are aware of all of the information”…and “are read into everything”. The Schumer Amendment was already “off the ground”. Thus the “read in” members of Congress had already disclosed enough (to the rest of congress) to make the claims in the Schumer Amendment. Were they allowed to explicitly say that the information “exists”? No, (they aren’t allowed to), but they did have enough clout to say something. As Nell said, they are saying, “we need this legislation because things aren’t working right” (referencing similar events surrounding the Church Committee in the 70s).

As Grusch implied, if DOPSR didn’t clear his Debrief claims, they’d be denying the content of the Schumer Amendment, which they know certain members of Congress KNOW IS TRUE.

Remember, Karl Nell was allowed to present the same kind of material to SOL…and he helped write the damn amendment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1QCFtod6i8

In other words, Grusch is basically regurgitating the gist of the material from the Amendment, which is an accepted artifact of Congress.

No one in the legislative branch is arguing about the veracity of the claims (the gang of eight is already aware and – as Nell says – are “implicitly” telling the rest of congress that). The only thing that is being fought over is how the disclosure process should go (eminent domain, review board).

The other stuff Grusch is saying is either “read between the lines” statements (“agreements”), or isn’t legally controllable intel by the US Gov’t. Take the Magenta crash for instance. He can talk about fairly openly it because it’s not US intel…and he knows we won’t deny it either.

Hope that makes sense.

Thank God for the Church Committee (and resulting Gang of Eight), thank God for whistleblower protections. Now, it’d be really awesome if Grusch could tell us more about his time at the NGA (as a UAP SME), at the same time as the Feb 2023 cylinder and octagonal craft shoot downs.

​