It would suck if the government wasn’t releasing their footage because it’s embarassed how grainy their videos are

Generate New Template

public (1567) , uap (1561) , disclosure (1383) , ufo (1296) , transparency (1220) , government (1066) , information (1011) , disinformation (943) , ufos (919) , campaign (862) , congress (769) , people (678) , phenomena (648) , national (632) , urge (586) , issue (565) , regarding (565) , unidentified (561) , security (538) , truth (506) , american (506) , support (503) , potential (498) , know (477) , trust (469) , uaps (467) , writing (462) , accountability (461) , time (424) , scientific (410) , intelligence (381) , understanding (370) , act (363) , rep (357) , members (354) , defense (331) , action (314) , efforts (311) , research (310) , committee (309) , objects (302) , related (301) , legislation (297) , house (290) , secrecy (288) , oversight (286) , template (283) , ndaa (282) , concern (280) , being (274) ,

Yeah, they have to classify it for “national security” reasons. National security would be compromised if people saw how shit their sensors were. Not sayin it’s like that, but it would suck if true

Like, at least if you have good footage, you can redact the HUD and make it low-res, but if you start with shit footage…not much you can do with that. Hence the classification, maybe.

submitted by /u/syndic8_xyz
[link] [comments] 

Read More