Looking for theory challenge

I mean, it’s not that far out to understand how density/velocity in physics works in relation to relative assignment of gravity. Only way a saucer doesn’t abide by relative atomsphere (nearby example: earth) is by creating a density point in the center of the craft, likely via a multi particle acceleration system to create a temporary absolute point of density through absolute velocity. Outcome is tons of potential energy, then it just needs direction, which in an absolute environment could be influenced by either simply pointing a light at it (constant) or feeding it a proton beam in the direction of travel (less solid theory) which converts the “universal engine” to instant outside kinetic force with influence of direction. If I can deduct this shit, well we’ve been seeing saucers since Roswell. Vector geometry based technology, create a simulation of geometric equilibrium (a universe) then give it direction. Could be powered by a nuclear fission mini reactor. It’s simple physics.

In a reverse deduction, it’s the only way a saucer could move without friction/acceleration under atmospheric conditions of a nearby point of resounding density via the “theory” of relativity, is if it had its own relative absolute point with ability to influence, or it abided by a different point of influenceable density, relatively.

Yes, I just explained to you how a “UFO” works. Probably just the government, Einstein likely deducted it and it went confidential.

But those Chinese balloons… gonna kill us all. “UFOs” well… they exist! No worries y’all (wink from your govt)