Hear me out, guys…
For me, it’s the idea that in a disinformation process, over some periods, disinformants can also act in your interests – in this case disclosure. But just because a person/media outlet is acting at the moment the way you want and saying things that you agree with doesn’t mean that they are pursuing the same goal or operate under the same premise as you.
In the example of NewsNation and Jeremy Corbell this could mean that he is now being medially tied to the inevitable disclosure in an early stage by some agency in order to gain a lasting interpretative sovereignty over society’s reception of this topic; be it on a national, global, or even interspecies level. So this could enable future disinformation or, in the best case, maybe is just a hijacking of the topic, for example, to attend and buffer ontological shock. So it would function more in a premise of control than truth. So when people often say ‘he’s hyped up and sick of the secrecy like us,’ it could mean they are being mirrored to sustain swimming in peoples flow of information and influence it.
I know guys, these are all just wild hypotheses and this could be applied with much tinfoil to virtually any person/organisation in the media. And yet I can’t overlook some interesting occurrences:
For example, first the sudden placement of the UFO-friendly NewsNation in the MSM due to a relaunch of the entertainment channel WGN America. This was initiated in 2021 by the NextStar Media Group, about whose administrative decisions I know shit and apparently nobody is talking here.
Then the seamless placement of Corbell as an expert on NewsNation because he got miraculously all the leaks and sat suddenly behind Grusch at the hearing and is connected to him in a way I don’t fully grasp yet. But hey, it’s all good because Corbell always has this story ready that Knapp made him now a journalist. I often get the feeling this kind of functions as a legitimizer for all the contacts that Corbell now maintains and it makes his network and media role appear more organic.
Or then on top, the sudden appearance of Sean Cahill as an expert on NewsNation. Such an odd choice for a mainstream outlet, since Cahill is only a fringe figure in the UFO topic and is actually best known just for being caught releasing some mysterious UFO video which was actually filmed by himself and in addition on Lue Elizondo’s property.
But as I said, none of these points are proof of a controlled agenda. However, viewed with a little distance, the whole thing still remains a rather unusual story about just how the media outlet around the UFO topic builds itself. I mean, normally, such dispositives/networks are formed through the cooperation of journalists and political/administrative/scientific figures with transparent institutional careers and connections.
I mean who are even some of these people?
And of course, I can see that this situation also stems from the fact that a wider serious medial discussion on the subject will only be possible once the data or evidence is no longer in the hands of a few. So for now, there is maybe a big vacuum in mainstream media that can only be filled with just these few who can only operate in this shady fog of classification and secrecy. This has to change.
And of course, not every guest on NewsNation has to be disinfo, I’m just hypothesising the potential; so people often might just be idealistic, money driven, entertaining or hyping up the story. But this situation of just a few talking heads still remains very ambiguous and thus vulnerable to disinformation. And as long as this is the case, I have to ask myself these questions and would like to encourage you also to remain critical until the real data is gathered and released. But it’s also in the interest to make such speculations like in this post obsolete.
So in the end I don’t want to make any conclusions. So Corbell, if you are legit, nevermind and keep up the good work!
In this sense: Stop the UFO secrecy! Support the UFO science!
submitted by /u/genericexistence
[link] [comments]