Pump the breaks on the MH370 VFX “debunk”

Generate New Template

public (1567) , uap (1561) , disclosure (1383) , ufo (1296) , transparency (1220) , government (1066) , information (1011) , disinformation (943) , ufos (919) , campaign (862) , congress (769) , people (678) , phenomena (648) , national (632) , urge (586) , issue (565) , regarding (565) , unidentified (561) , security (538) , truth (506) , american (506) , support (503) , potential (498) , know (477) , trust (469) , uaps (467) , writing (462) , accountability (461) , time (424) , scientific (410) , intelligence (381) , understanding (370) , act (363) , rep (357) , members (354) , defense (331) , action (314) , efforts (311) , research (310) , committee (309) , objects (302) , related (301) , legislation (297) , house (290) , secrecy (288) , oversight (286) , template (283) , ndaa (282) , concern (280) , being (274) ,

The VFX kit used was from the 1990s. 100% proven. Absolutely no doubts, no one can argue

Where I’m struggling with accepting this as case closed…

That drone footage WAS amazing. Right? Is anyone doubting that??? I mean that’s why we spent THIS much time on it. The plane model, drone model, contrails, the turbulence underneath the contrails exactly where you’d expect them to be… It’s legit stunning the attention to detail that would’ve been required to fabricate it. It should honestly be considered a work of art to have fooled this many people, for this long, this much time after it’s creation…

Those 4 frames, though.

That’s where I’m kind of lost. That was 1995 level VFX, no doubt. At all… And THAT’S the bit I find the most confusing…

Not just that you’d willfully ruin something you would’ve undoubtedly spent a fair bit of time creating…

But WOULD a VFX kit from the mid 90s even work with a VFX program from 2014?? We’re talking something designed for Windows 95, ACTUALLY functioning inside a program created for Windows 8. Pic ANY OS… That 20 year gap between the VFX kit and whichever program people think was responsible for rendering it… I don’t see how they were compatible.

So isn’t more likely IF it was done by the same person, that they would’ve had to have rendered the video in full, and then edited it in an older program???

Failing to see why anyone WOULD…

Doesn’t this leave room for the possibility someone else edited the video prior to handing it over to RegicideAnon??? If WE tracked down the person behind the channel… DoD absolutely could have. If the satellite video is a legitimate leak, they ABSOLUTELY would’ve had incentive to discredit it…

I think it’s at least possible the drone footage was real, too, and was edited by DoD, or DoE, prior to “leaking” it to RegicideAnon. The company that owns the VFX kit does have DoD and DoE contracts. I think it’s a mistake to just write this whole thing off because of 4 frames. I think someone should dig into the satellite footage and very for SURE there’s no questionble VFX BS in there. If not, might be a sign the drone footage was edited AFTER the fact.

submitted by /u/SkepticlBeliever
[link] [comments] 

Read More