That hype for “interdimensional” is annoying to say the least. There is no proof or evidence leading whatsoever to claim other habitable dimensions exist but there is strong evidence to support that the universe is very, very old and that there are habitable planets around many stars, probably in all the galaxies, some that most probably were inhabitable before the Earth.
There is also proof that space time can be bent by gravity and that leads to the strong supposition that with the correct amount of energy we can use it to travel from star to star minutes or hours.
We don’t know what visual effects and side effects a technology like that could create and we don’t know what other purpose it could serve other than travelling.
Also a civilization that mastered this technology has to be way older than ours and they are probably not fully biological anymore, they could even be fully synthetic.
Imagine what nanotechnologies could do to a body, you wouldn’t need to have a permanent shape, you could essentially take the shape you want according to what you need to do. What would we see with our human eyes in front of us if an entire ship or a being changed shape constantly, wouldn’t one be tempted to summon an additional dimension argument ?
And what about very advanced AI that could collect since millenia real time big data thanks to nanodrones and advanced measurements to simulate and predict the near future with 99,9% probability making them able to chose the exact moment they make themselves perceptible and when to not be noticeable, giving the impression that they come from the future or that they are aware of it ?
Very advanced aliens would definetly look like what we imagine to be “interdimensional” because they use technology that we are not familiar with, they can most probably manipulate space time and electromagnetic fields and that’s what we end calling “interdimensional” while they are physical, very real and it’s not all in your head.
“Interdimensional” is a word that fits well for the common philistine because it means nothing at all so that everyone can imagine his own personal fantasy but nobody can tell you what that really means.
The problem is that they can’t say to the public : “we don’t know what they are but probably we live since centuries or millenia surrounded by ancient civilizations that are way above what we can image in terms of superiority and that adapted to life in space way before we started to be a civilization and can play at will with the rules of the very fabric of reality”.
That would be a game changer because that means it questions the origins of mankind, yet on the other side saying it’s “interdimensional” has an external connotation, it’s a dead end, it has nothing to do with our reality, it doesn’t question anything about life, it stays in the religious, esoteric, mystical circlejerking of interpretation.
It’s an intellectually lazy word. When you say “interdimensional” you don’t even know what you are talking about and they want you to remain ignorant so they can control the narrative if ever they need. A lot like the church in the Middle Age.
It doesn’t lead to more questions and that’s exactly what they want. Don’t question what you are, they come from another dimension, it’s too complicated. Like a child bragging about his imaginary new bike “my dad bought me a bike that’s made of gold but he doesn’t want me to show you”. You have to take their word for it.
The reality is that this word suits them well (not the aliens, the secret keepers and their lackeys) because whenever they are asked to give more details they can say that it’s too complicated to talk about it.
submitted by /u/hectorpardo
[link] [comments]