The MSM’s recent coverage of UFO disclosure—A closer look at the lack of meaningful content from mainstream articles and reports

As a number of users and the general public prepare for the release of David Gruschs’ Opinion Editorial, I thought it would be insightful to look at mainstream outlets and dissect their coverage (or lack thereof) of disclosure. Digging into these articles I’ve found that the main figureheads of the pro-disclosure and pro-skeptic camps appear quite often, but the many claims and eyebrow raising pieces of information relating to the individuals themselves cannot be found. None of the articles did a good job of providing a robust look at disclosure (outside of the Guardian’s piece from January 14th) in favor of filling page space with mentions of Project Mogul, Project Skyhook and hoaxes from the 1950’s, while heralding Sean Kirkpatrick as the go to expert on UFOs.

MSM KEYWORDS COUNT:

NOTE: The Hill & NewsNation have been removed as they’re not considered MSM and carry an overt positive leaning with regards to disclosure.

19 articles in total were researched from Jan. 1st – January 31st

David Grusch – 13

Sean Kirkpatrick – 6

UAPTF – 4

Ryan Graves – 4

David Fravor – 4

DNI ICIG – 4
(founds claims of secret SAPs and whistleblower intimidation credible & urgent)

DoD IG – 3
(watchdog that released report showing the DoD is failing to investigate UAP properly)

NRO – 1

NGA – 1

UAPDA – 1

Chuck Schumer – 1

Mike Rounds – 1

Charles McCullough – 0
(Grusch’s lawyer, ex-ICIG)

Colonel. Karl Nell – 0

One of the most credible figures in the disclosure space is Colonel Karl Nell who stated technologies in possession of the US gov have non-human origins. His claims should be explored and scrutinized further than Gruschs’ even—as he’s been the Modernization Advisor to Vice Chief of Staff of the Army for 6+ years, and yet as we can see he appears nowhere.

Chuck Schumer is a Gang of Eight member and one of the most powerful Senators in Congress, he floored an amendment called the UAPDA with Mike Rounds, this was/is the most robust piece of UAP legislation ever created with the backing of a lead member of the Senate Intelligence Community. His claims and ideas regarding disclosure should be scrutinized and investigated rigorously, and yet he appears virtually nowhere.

David Grusch’s personal lawyer is Charles McCullough. He was the longest standing ICIG from 2010-2017 and only became DG’s personal council after the Intelligence Community opened an untrustworthy and false criminal investigation against Grusch for continuing to press the IC and investigate claims of reverse-engineering legacy programs. These are wild claims, they should be scrutinized and investigated further—are you seeing a pattern?

If this is a distraction, a psyop if you will, why don’t the most incredible parts of Grusch’s work history, the SIC’s drafting of the UAPDA and names of credible officials and lawyers attached to disclosure appear in every MSM article that the DoD can use to spew falsehoods? Maybe, just maybe the DoD and IC have lost control of the narrative and they don’t want the public shining a light on them while incredible claims from credible people expose a secret regarding UAP.