What is the best summary of all the UFO information so far?

Generate New Template

public (1567) , uap (1561) , disclosure (1383) , ufo (1296) , transparency (1220) , government (1066) , information (1011) , disinformation (943) , ufos (919) , campaign (862) , congress (769) , people (678) , phenomena (648) , national (632) , urge (586) , issue (565) , regarding (565) , unidentified (561) , security (538) , truth (506) , american (506) , support (503) , potential (498) , know (477) , trust (469) , uaps (467) , writing (462) , accountability (461) , time (424) , scientific (410) , intelligence (381) , understanding (370) , act (363) , rep (357) , members (354) , defense (331) , action (314) , efforts (311) , research (310) , committee (309) , objects (302) , related (301) , legislation (297) , house (290) , secrecy (288) , oversight (286) , template (283) , ndaa (282) , concern (280) , being (274) ,

I have some friends that are interested in the UFO topic, but are (understandably) very skeptical. I think the fact that I believe is a big factor in them wanting to hear more, as I am generally a pretty evidence-based person.

I know there have been several great documentaries (James Fox comes to mind), but these obviously only contain information that was available at the time of their release. I think the David Grusch testimony is absolutely a key piece of evidence for my friends.

Another thing to consider, assuming this takes the form of some kind of video, is length. You want something that contains a lot of information, but isn’t so long that they lose interest. I honestly think a feature-length film is asking too much for a non-believer to commit to.

So, any ideas? Is there a recently-made summary of evidence that is approximately 20-30 minutes in length? Something well-made that is entertaining enough to keep the attention of someone that has expressed interest in the topic, but clearly not interested enough to look into it themselves (yet). Looking to spark a fire here. Thanks!

submitted by /u/mercury_fred
[link] [comments] 

Read More