Dear New York Times Editor,
My name is [Your Name] and I am writing to inquire about the New York Times’ allocation of resources towards investigating the recent testimony under oath of David Grusch, a former National Reconnaissance Officer Representative for the Department of Defense’s Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Task Force.
Mr. Grusch’s testimony, delivered before the U.S. House of Representatives in July 2023, raised significant questions about the U.S. government’s knowledge and handling of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs), commonly referred to as UFOs. His claims included potential possession of non-human spacecraft and biological material by the government, prompting widespread public interest and debate.
Given the New York Times’ reputation for thorough investigative journalism and its commitment to uncovering crucial truths, I am curious to know if the paper has dedicated any specific resources to delving deeper into Mr. Grusch’s claims and the surrounding UAP phenomenon.
Specifically, I would be interested in learning:
Has the New York Times formed a dedicated team or assigned specific reporters to investigate Mr. Grusch’s testimony and the broader UAP topic?
Has the paper contacted official sources or conducted independent research to follow up on Mr. Grusch’s claims?
Are there any plans for future investigative reporting on UAPs and the government’s potential knowledge?
Understanding the New York Times’ commitment to this subject would be highly appreciated by both myself and many others who are keen on seeing thorough and objective reporting on this important topic.
Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your response.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
submitted by /u/MartianMaterial to r/disclosureparty
[link] [comments]