Diana Pasulka’s recent appearance on Joe Rogan has resurfaced a debate about why figures like her and Dave Grusch use the word “biologics” when referring to or insinuating the presence of UAP craft pilots. Once again, people seem to be confused by this word choice — why not aliens, NHI, ET or biological organisms?
I don’t consider this word choice strange. Many have pointed out that this term refers to manufactured organic materials — mainly in biotech. It seems to be the perfect word choice to describe these “beings” for the following reason:
Back in the summer, a user who supposedly worked at a medical facility which analyzes the biological remains of UAP crashes described in extraordinary detail that these beings seem to be manufactured for specific purposes just like the craft they travel in. Their DNA is written succinctly without any superfluous code. They do not possess reproductive organs nor a comprehensive digestive system, thus, they are more like biological drones, organic bots — in other words, biologics.
I concede, the likelihood of this user being a real whistleblower is very low and their story was most likely made-up, in which case the copious details are at the very least imaginative.
Nevertheless, the details, whether real or not, line up quite well with the word choice from credible sources like Pasulka, Nolan and Grusch.
It would help explain why their origin — whether extraterrestrial, interdimensional or ultraterrestrial — is still undetermined. Artificial pilots could insinuate a highly advanced extraterrestrial origin, ultraterrestrial origin or even a “playable character” for a higher dimensional being to interact with us in our plane of reality.
Thoughts?
P.S. I couldn’t find the post from the summer. Would be grateful if someone else could.
submitted by /u/thepleasureismine11
[link] [comments]