IMHO, It’s more likely that David Grusch is honest and accurate than dishonest and inaccurate (despite the recent doubts expressed by some media outlets and some skeptics like Joe Rogan, Steven Greenstreet, Sean Kirkpatrick, and Mick West).
This is my first and perhaps only Reddit post (unless official alien disclosure happens in the near future). It regards my top 4 reasons why I think he is credible. Sorry if I am beating a dead horse since the debate over his credibility is often posted here on Reddit. Of course, for believers, it is preaching to the choir, while for skeptics they won’t be convinced until top secret UFO evidence finally is released officially or is leaked (if that ever happens in our lifetimes).
I’m making this post as a reminder to those who might doubt Grusch more than they believe him due to recent attempts by various media and people (Dr. Kirkpatrick and Greenstreet in particular) to outright dismiss all his UFO crash retrieval claims or similar UAP claims associated with him. These are my top 4 reasons why Grusch is likely telling the truth and his information is probably more accurate than inaccurate.
1 His professional background in the intelligence community and military and his testimony under oath in both public and private meetings with Congress (both the UAP subcommittee and the various House and Senate Intelligence committees) make him more personally credible. This man is not your average UFO conspiracy theorist. Despite his PTSD history, he still retained his security clearance, meaning he was still a credible and competent intelligence officer in the eyes of the military.
2 The language used in the first version of the UAPDA from Senators Schumer and Rounds (NHI, non human technology and biology, crash retrieval, eminent domain, etc.) indicates high level members of Congress privy to top secret information take his claims seriously. Likewise, the “cock blocking” and watering down of the UAPDA by certain members of Congress (on the intelligence committees and with possible backing from the secretive intelligence community and military contractor donors) is mega SUS and indicates there is likely a coverup regarding UAPs and SAPs by the intelligence community and military of the executive branch.
3 The ICIG (Mr. Monheim) has shared with Congress in a SCIF that some of his claims (probably those regarding reprisal and misappropriation of funds) are credible, which indicates that his other paranormal UAP claims might be true as well. If he’s telling some of the truth, then he could be telling all or most of the truth.
4 The UFO phenomenon (despite the various prosaic explanations and hoaxes for most cases) is real. There have been many anomalous UFO cases in the 20th century particularly (as well as some this century and some in antiquity). A relatively small percentage of UAP cases are very anomalous and apparently paranormal (those catergorized as “other” or unresolved by the UAP task force and its successor AARO). If even 1 percent of cases are truly anomalous and apparently paranormal, then there is some indication that a non human intelligence (interdimensional, extraterrestrial, extratemporal, or earthbound cryptid) is present in our world. Since the phenomenon is real, it makes it somewhat more likely that some or all of his claims are true. (If he were making extraordinary claims about unicorns, they would be very likely false since the unicorn phenomenon, unlike UFOs taken seriously by the military, is pure fantasy). Personally, I was always fascinated by the Gimbal UFO video and case that I regard as the best UFO video and case (due to its official confirmation by the military, the bewildered dialogue of the pilots recording it, and its resemblance to classic flying saucers with weird rotation) and which I think has still not been officially resolved by AARO or its predecessor the UAP task force (despite internet skeptic claims of debunking it with prosaic explanations). If it has been officially resolved by either of those, then my sincere apologies.
Thus, I lean toward Mr. Grusch likely telling the whole truth or some version of the truth. I personally don’t think he is outright lying. However, if some of his 40 interviewed witnesses are less credible than him (perhaps due to connections to some of the apparent fabrications and unverified claims involved with Skinwalker Ranch research by the Pentagon and AAWSAP), then perhaps he is partially or mainly unintentionally inaccurate due to imperfect sources. Only time will tell if his witnesses are telling him the truth.
Hopefully, President Biden makes the famous alien speech before the upcoming 2024 election, or the recent version of the UAPDA makes public UFO information in the National Archives that verifies some of Grusch’s claims, or some of the 40 witnesses become public whistleblowers to Congress this year to finally verify his claims. Naturally, this might not happen and the UFO coverup “cockblocking” and “blueballing” will likely continue for the foreseeable future as indicated by the rejection of the Schumer- Rounds amendment last year. We’ll see if 2024 turns out differently for UFO disclosure and if David Grusch goes down in history as the man who helped start the paradigm shift that non human intelligence is on our planet.
Of course, Grusch and I could be wrong (no claims to infallibility on my part), but that’s my 2 cents (take it or leave it lol).
EDIT: Reason 5 He is not alone in his claims and has some apparent credible support of other professionals like him. Of course, he has his undisclosed 40 witnesses in the military and intelligence community. Some of their identities might be known and credible (Karl Nell and maybe Jonathan Grey mentioned in the Debrief article). I have seen the credibility of others who support him is often debated here on Reddit (like Elizondo, Mellon, Lazar, Davis, etc.)
submitted by /u/jokerjr30
[link] [comments]