Karl Nell, retired colonel of the US Army, gave a presentation at the Sol Foundation organized by Dr. Gary Nolan. The topic was the Schumer Amendment and Controlled Disclosure. I’m considering giving a break down of all the Sol videos and my personal key takeaways. Nell’s presentation was very interesting and I want to point out some things I think many people without my personal background knowledge may miss. If you are familiar with my work on the UFO subject, I cover many aspects but have a deep focus on science, technology and energy. It’s very relevant to what Nell is discussing.
Nell is discussing the definitions and scope of the legislation as well as the intentions and people involved. That information is very relevant and he paints a very good picture that there are knowledgable subject matter experts involved and that this is about not just oversight, but presumed disclosure. That means that the information is intended to be shared publicly barring only a few exceptions. It all sounds good and reasonable, but there is one glaring deficiency if you want to call it that. And that is absolutely none of it applies to anything that could be considered nuclear technology because of the Atomic Energy Act. I want to get into why that may be a really big deal. And yes, I understand that we can’t advocate making something public knowledge that could be potentially weaponized, but that’s not the issue. Obviously we don’t want to make a recipe for a weapon public knowledge. The problem is how easily this could create a loophole for any technology that produces energy as long as it can be labeled as nuclear. It’s a potentially giant loop hole. He mentions this very casually around the 7:45 mark in the video linked above.
Let’s just pretend for a second that we get our hands on a crash retrieval and we open up the engine and look inside so to speak. If it’s powered by energy beaming, anti-matter, quantum entanglement, zero point energy, or some completely unknown new physics then that theoretically should end up becoming disclosed after proper reviews to make sure it won’t be done in a dangerously disruptive way especially economically. That’s great! However, if it has a compact fusion reactor (which is a technology we arguably aren’t even that far away from achieving and Lockheed has patents for) or if it’s powered by something like “cold fusion” or low energy nuclear reactions (LENR) then it basically stays DARK. You will not learn anything about it. It’s not subject to this legislation. End of story. Nothing to see here, folks.
(If you want to take a quick detour into exotic physics and how “cold fusion” relates to the UFO subject look no further than my investigative work into physicists Hal Puthoff, Eric Davis and Ken Shoulders’ work as well as the SAFIRE Project.)
Obviously, that’s a problem. I would like to see humanity become the kind of Type 1 civilization that doesn’t require to get its energy from its local star because it understands how to make its own stars on a micro scale to generate its energy needs, which is what fusion energy is. That’s nuclear technology and it doesn’t apply to this disclosure plan. That worries me.
At around the 9:15 mark in the video, Nell says one of the seven reasons we care is because we can’t do open scientific research. Once again, this is a common problem on the subject of nuclear research already and especially in the controversial field of LENR. In fact the field of “cold fusion” and LENR share many striking parallels to the current UFO/UAP subject. For example, changing the term UFO to UAP to help remove the stigma as well as better define the subject. This very same thing has happened with “cold fusion” research being essentially rebranded as LENR.
Around the 10 min mark, Nell goes into why the term UAP is more accurate and phenomena could be a whole range of things: from metaphysical to psychosocial to nuts and bolts to religious. He says that there is an intentional ambiguity in order to help reach a consensus and that the next phase is to better define and narrow the scope. Once again, this a parallel to “cold fusion” research.
At the 12:30 mark, Nell says that this is about focusing on the things not defined by physics. It’s about the unknown unknowns. That’s great! But don’t forget it doesn’t apply to nuclear physics. So if nuclear transmutation and nonradioactive nuclear energy sources are found, the rules do not apply! That will stay secret with the current language.
At the 29 min mark, Nell mentions how one of the immediate areas that we can make progress is in material science arena and mentions Gary Nolan’s discussion of utilizing and engineering isotopes. That sounds a lot like what the LENR people are already claiming they are working on. But, once again, wouldn’t that easily end up labeled as “nuclear” and not subject to the disclosure process?
At the 30:30 minute mark and the end of the presentation, Nell mentions the potential to find new energy sources. Because at the end of the day, that’s the most pragmatic approach and what this is actually about. UFOs need an energy source and it’s likely better than fossil fuels. I know most people want to focus on the subject of NHI and I don’t discount that. It’s also a worthy discussion, but the pragmatic discussion is solving the energy crisis. Who knows, maybe that’s been the point all along. If you think there is NHI acting as Jaque Valle has suggested (basically trying to teach us or control us,) then it’s conceivable all the fuss over UFOs and nukes could be a kind of, “hey, that’s not how your supposed to do that you dummies!”
One last thing of interest. At the 24:31 mark, Nell shares a slide about the pros and cons of non-disclosure and it mentions “memetic virus“. This doesn’t get enough attention on this sub. This is a concept that some of you should explore so that you can better understand how to interpret Jacque Valle’s “control mechanism” hypothesis as well as why the topic of cults is actually very relevant to the UFO subject. At a certain point, we have to consider a notion put forward by Peter Levenda that not only is all of religion basically like a cargo cult, but so are our scientific institutions and basically all of current known human history. It’s an acknowledgement, of how fundamentally irrational humans are especially when we congregate in groups and no group is immune to it, not even our academic and scientific institutions. On that note, I’d like to share some of my research into a UFO cult that will truly push the boundaries of the UFO discussion.
submitted by /u/efh1
[link] [comments]