SPACE WAR THEORY: Not so fast to fear — or to assume Mike Turner did wrong.

There’s an elemental flaw with the theory that Russian nukes are:

A: new in space; they’re not. The nuclear arsenal there has been built over decades. BUT:

B: There are still nowhere near enough nukes up ther to take out ALL our satellite capabilities because:

C: nukes are destructive on EARTH because there is matter (atoms through which to blow shock waves, which are destructive — no matter = no destruction. There’s no particulate matter in space & therefore nothing to “push” with nuclear shock waves, thus:

D: you’d need a close-range fire of a nuke at one missile per unit thousands of very small targets (satellites are mostly small) and direct-hit. This is a VERY expensive and frankly, stupid plan. No one with a small budget, or even a large budget would waste it this way. Not only would the satellite have to have propulsion & move around up there, flying from target to target (or else have one shooter for every satellite which is berserk… oh, and shoot through space junk, because if a weapon hits space junk first, its payload would be blown.)

SO, CONSIDER THIS:

E: Currently, there is no “known” (or published) tech that can propel a nuke from extra-orbital space and into orbital space, taking into account the Earth’s spin, to hit finally target on the ground with any accuracy. HOWEVER:

F: If some has cracked (or is close to cracking) an effective and accurate propulsion method to fire nukes from extra orbital space to earth (leveraging gravity to assist in pulling the missile to the ground), THEN and ONLY THEN:

G: is there a real nuclear threat to nukes in space. Otherwise, it’s a big waste of cash & manpower.

SO… onto Mike Turner & whether he had was an “Ah-ha moment and did the USba solid for our peace of mind:

A: Perhaps Turner knows something that he otherwise thinks the American people or the RUSSIANS shouldn’t know. Such as: ‘perhaps’ the US has the propulsion technology to launch nukes from space. Or to neutralize threats from space. (The latter is unlikely. Propelled nukes that are under the force of gravity would so so fast, I couldn’t calculate the Mach level. S400 can reportedly stop an incoming up to Mach 14. Imagine S500. It makes sense that the owner of the world’s most sophisticated missile defense system would know how to breach it!)

HYPOTHESIS: B: If the US had developed propulsion technology that has been reverse engineered from NHI or even AHI (advanced human intelligence), then we actually DO have technology for Russia, China, Iran, etc. to fear. WE could be the one that can penetrate S400 & S500 or ANYTHING else currently on the ground. Given good enough math (our math isn’t accurate enough, I don’t think) we could theoretically take out ICBMs with missiles positioned in space. Regardless, this would STILL cause global death & demise.

[Be logical: No one is going to throw a nuke unless they are suicidal. Do not confuse atomic weapons with nukes & fall into the mushoom-cloud daze thinking that damage is localized. That radiation will sicken the whole planet!]

Thus the fact that nukes could be trained on Earth targets from other countries is not so scary. As stated, it would be almost impossible to shoot those missiles down, but no one in power is stupid enough to launch a nuke.

But, for propaganda and lay-people’s sake, the nuclear war conversation is big enough to turn elections. Big enough to hide black budget spending. Or: NOT spend a lot on the black budget for tech, but spend a lot for propaganda and for hollow projects.

LOOK FOR SOMETHING ELSE. The nuclear discussion is a sideshow. And quite possibly, a large segment of the UAP discussion as applied to space wars is a front as well. For something else being done. Something seemingly unrelated. Look for that.

I believe Mike Turner leaked that there’s a big topic ahead of going into the SCIF. He threw it out there as an entirely anomalous behavior so that someone would pick it up.

OK, Mike Turner. Hopefully, I’ve got some free-thinkers thinking.

Remember, Mike could be a foe, a friendly, or a stooge.

Either way, I’m paying attention and I STRONGLY suggest that if this group is action-oriented, you’ll start fact-checking things that I’ve said. Start digging, investigate. Validate or invalidate anything and every statement that I made. Because frankly, I don’t have the time. And it should be done.