We’ve had a lot of news over the last year or so. Grush was definitely an inflection point, and arguably the congressional hearing with the three of them was yet another.
After each inflection point, however, we get another where advancement of knowledge tends to taper off.
Maybe we won’t get true confirmation anytime soon, but maybe some more inflection points that spark advancement.
Here’s my list, in order of probability (most likely to least):
Another released sighting which is seen as significant proof (though not confirmation) by non ufologists – say tic tac level. Maybe get multiples of these A new high level credible witness not heard from before, retired from govt/MIC A field hearing or another congressional hearing Presidential candidates seriously talking about the issue during debates or announcements Another released sighting which is taken seriously by both ufologists and MSM (reuters, AP, nyt, wsj, wapo, etc) – self evidently superior than any released sighting so far (resolution, behavior, appearance, chain of custody).
Another Grusch level whistleblower going truly public in the way Grusch did, one that is active in govt/MIC A UAP bill/ammendment voted in and perhaps even signed into law A UAP subcommittee is formed An executive order releasing UAP specific information Formal admission by whitehouse or other active credible govt / MIC leadership that NHI tech exists. Detailed technical information revealed which is advanced enough to be suspected as NHI A breakthrough in state of the art from release detail technical info (anti grav, power generation, dimensional travel, etc)
For me, confirmation won’t really happen until a breakthrough, but my confidence level (already higher than most normies) will certainly increase via #2+
#1 won’t do much for me personally at this point, though certainly interesting.
Some of the hearing / bill signing / subcommittee / EO stuff is lower probability but not necessarily higher impact for me. A lot of it is context dependent for sure.
submitted by /u/blazespinnaker
[link] [comments]