Ok, I understand the Sheehan grain of salt. But this one I’d give greater than 90% credibility to.
Here’s why.
Imagine being in Congress, and you’re sitting in a confidential briefing with David Grusch (as Senators Schumer, Rounds, Rubio and others were), where Grusch is laying out his confidential evidence for non-human intelligence and UAP crash retrieval programs in the US government.
And among that evidence is a study of DNA from “biologics”, which concludes that the DNA is of an alien being.
Think about it. What other level of evidence would compel these Senators to make the extreme step of openly requiring that the USG disclose what it knows about aliens and UFOs?
I mean, supporting and writing that original Schumer Amendment could easily have ended all their political careers. They must have seriously seen some incredible evidence to go to those extreme lengths.
If this is all out in the sky, then why block the Schumer Amendment?
submitted by /u/mattriver
[link] [comments]