I will start with a simple proposition: Either (i) the AARO Report is accurate and there is no need for the UAP Amendment (such that effectuating the requirements of the UAP Amendment would be government misappropriation of tax-payer money), or (ii) the AARO Report is a documented lie from an executive agency to Congress and thus enhancement and expansions of the UAP Amendment (including reinstatement of the eminent domain and review board provisions as well as establishment of penalty provisions) are extremely imperative and should be implemented immediately.
As you are all aware, the congressionally passed and signed into law version of the Schumer-led UAP disclosure amendment (the “UAP Amendment”) differs in material ways from the originally proposed version.
The initial version of the UAP Amendment included, among other things, (i) an eminent domain provision, which would have mandated the Federal Government’s exercise of eminent domain over UAP-related material controlled by private persons or entities, and (ii) the establishment and empowerment of a presidentially selected and senate confirmed civilian Review Board to review UAP documentation and make decisions regarding public disclosure, including whether postponement of disclosure under certain delineated circumstances would be warranted.
Neither of these provisions made it into the final bill.
A week ago, AARO submitted to Congress part one of a two-part historical review of USG involvement with UAPs (the “AARO Report”). As we know, the AARO Report unequivocally denied any USG knowledge or involvement with extraterrestrials or non-human intelligence.
Collectively, these two events appear to fundamentally contradict each other.
It is difficult to understand the justification for modifying the UAP Amendment when the AARO has now effectively and unequivocally confirmed to Congress that there are absolutely no meaningful disclosures to be made pursuant to the UAP Amendment.
Why would anyone be concerned that the USG would have eminent domain over, or that a civilian review board would have access to, absolutely nothing of substance?
If we are to accept the findings of the AARO, then objectors to the UAP Amendment should not have sought to have the bill modified but instead should have declared that the UAP Amendment has no purpose and that any use of time and funds would be pure government waste.
Yet, the UAP amendment was merely modified and then approved. Now, however, AARO is implicitly asserting that time and tax-payer money will be spent effectuating the disclosure requirements of a bill that is in direct contradiction of the AARO Report (which unequivocally confirms that nothing material exists that would fall under the purview of the UAP Amendment).
If we are to believe the conclusions of the AARO Report, then it arguably would be the constitutional duty of our Congress to unwind the UAP amendment — because both cannot be true at the same time — there cannot be both nothing material to disclose and a tax-payer funded discovery process into something that can bear no fruit.
Any proponents of the UAP Amendment who question the veracity of the AARO Report (despite it being a document submitted to Congress with the assertion of truthfulness) should immediately act to amend and supplement the UAP Amendment to reinstate the eminent domain and review board provisions and include penalty provisions for compliance failures — using the AARO Report as an absolute counter to any objections concerning those provisions.
Importantly, if objectors to the UAP Amendment have any question as to the veracity of the AARO Report such that they do not immediately push for revocation of the UAP Amendment (which is what they should be doing if they believe absolutely in the veracity of the AARO Report), then that fact alone significantly supports the necessity of reinstating the eminent domain and review board provisions and incorporating penalty provisions for compliance failures (because any such doubt means a belief that the AARO has lied to Congress – making it imperative for prompt, aggressive, and fulsome disclosure mechanisms)
The AARO Report also empowers the argument that any objection to eminent domain or civilian involvement have no merit because the AARO Report has unequivocally confirmed that there is nothing for the USG to assert eminent domain over and there is nothing material that will need to be reviewed by the Review Board.
The UAP Amendment clearly defines what is covered by the bill (focused heavily on non-human intelligence and phenomena that has no scientific or known-human explanation and exhibits traits far beyond current human capabilities), and there should be no concern of inadvertent disclosure of national security secrets or USG acquisition of private property through eminent domain. If the UAP sightings and experiences are merely US technology or explainable phenomena (as concluded by the AARO Report), they would not be subject to disclosure under the UAP Amendment.
The AARO report has effectively concluded and attested to Congress that there is nothing material that could possibly be disclosed under the UAP Amendment.
I urge each of you to write to your representatives and ask them to promptly reinstate the eminent domain and review board provisions from the original version of the UAP Amendment, as well as include in the bill penalty provisions for failure to comply with the bill’s disclosure requirements, citing for support the AARO Report’s unequivocal conclusion that the USG has not at any point now or in the past had knowledge of any non-human UAPs, extraterrestrials, or non-human intelligence.
submitted by /u/Empty-Sea5180
[link] [comments]