I haven’t seen any discussion about this (perhaps I missed it) but Daniel Sheehan dropped this news on the Big Thing podcast last week. When Kristian Harloff asked Danny what should Grusch’s next move be Sheehan replied (and I’m paraphrasing),
I don’t represent Grusch, his attorney was Chuck McCullough however he no longer represents Grusch and in fact now works for a private aerospace company.
They just moved on with the conversation like it didn’t mean anything.
Am I wrong in thinking that this could have bigger implications than the casual nature in which Sheehan mentioned this news?
Is Grusch in a position where he no longer requires such high powered representation and McCullough’s expertise was more urgently needed elsewhere?
What, if anything, does the move to work for and I’m assuming provide legal counsel to a private aerospace company indicate?
My guess is this move is to help negotiate UAP disclosure act 2.0 which is currently with Senate Intel. With McCullough’s expertise in intel and seemingly the UAP subject after representing Grusch, it makes sense that he would be in a position to help connect both sides behind the scenes and push things forward.
With him now assisting from the other side which is resisting eminent domain, conversations around Intellectual property rights are taking place so could this be an indication at least one aerospace company is in fact negotiating how to move forward?
I share my thoughts here on my show, err podcast? IDK what to call it. I’m just excited to talk about this stuff.
Original episode of The Big Thing with Danny Sheehan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LXEZHzPA0M
Am I reading too much into this, overlooking something?
What say you?
submitted by /u/LuciD_FluX
[link] [comments]