First, let me give my opinions on these common reasons.
No disclosure due to religion: I find this false. If the world governments could dispose of religion, which I’d believe they would want to (more division against people which means more power to them), they would. If they were scared of disclosure due to the fear of what it would do to religions, that belief to me is a contradiction. I feel that religions would grow more powerful if disclosure happened and the government knows this. And if they all collapsed, the government benefits from this.
No disclosure due to the people not being able to handle it: I find this false and lazy. All the government wants is money and compliance from the people. If they disclosed, they’d get both of that in overwhelming popularity.
No disclosure due to national security: I find this false. “National security” is an easy and enveloping answer. It’s used for everything and anything to stop people in their tracks. If they couldn’t release disclosure, I feel it would benefit national security if there was a threat as the war machine benefits from war.
My thought: they genuinely have no clue what these are. I don’t think anyone does and the scariest part of disclosure for me would be this. “They exist but we have no clue at all what they are, but they don’t seem friendly.”
That’s the part I don’t think they, let alone people, can handle if it came to that. If they had less info on it than we believed they did, then that would be worse off for all parties.
What’re your thoughts? I’m interested to see what you think.
submitted by /u/AAFourAA
[link] [comments]