The US Military is not going to lie to the public

The US Military is not going to lie to the public. This would erode trust. All statements must be assumed to be true. It’s like when a lawyer speaks. It’s why EULAs are so long. You have to be specific.

So when the Air Force says “The US Air Force is not in possession of any UFO materials”. That’s a true statement, because the US Dept of Energy (or Private Contractor) is who has the goods.

We have to start using specific language when we want to narrow down. Continually asking if we have “aliens” or “alien tech” will get a no. Because that’s not how it’s labeled. It’s labeled “non-human intelligently made tech”.

Reporters should ask questions like:

“In official communications, terms like ‘non-human intelligence’ are used. Can you explain what this term encompasses and which department is primarily responsible for its oversight?”

“When the Air Force states it does not possess any UFO materials, does this mean no branch of the military holds such materials, or are they perhaps held by another department or agency such as the Department of Energy or a private contractor?”

“Are there specific instances where materials have been transferred from military custody to another department or private entity for further analysis or containment? Can details of such instances be disclosed?”

“What oversight mechanisms are in place to ensure that the handling of materials classified under terms like ‘non-human intelligence’ adheres to legal and ethical standards?”

“Are there plans to declassify more information regarding UAPs in the near future? What might trigger such a decision?”