Are UFOs impacted by energies and gravitational anomalies generated by fault lines? A few new clues and questions from a claimed UFO Program leaker on a similar subreddit.


0. High level summary

I propose that fault lines may play a significant and under documented role in what is happening with UFOs and specifically the impact of fault lines on some number of UFO related crashes. I suspect energetic effects from fault lines and gravity effects from mass variances in fault lines (especially while active) impact UFO/NHI navigational systems. They may do things like routing around, or via, fault lines.

1. A new leaker: Dijkstra’s algorithm and Diablo Canyon.

On May 13th, 2024, a claimed leaker on UFO/NHI related programs posted on /r/Aliens with details on their history with the “Program”.

Link. Archive link.

It’s a huge volume of data but one very particular passage instantly stuck out to me:

“The craft use a system that originally befuddled generations of researchers, but it’s essentially a 3D dijkstra algorithm. It finds points around the craft, and chooses the most efficient possible route through space time to get to that point. Some of the parameters it uses to gauge efficiency are totally unknown to us and are a serious point of contention. It’s not autonomy, but rather obstacle avoidance not unlike what you would see in a self-driving car. But, the self driving car could go through air, space and water without worrying about what medium its in. Additionally, the algo accounts for the crafts place in time.”

And then this surprising sentence shortly after:

“Although the algo is extremely effective, Nuclear explosions and experiments somehow interfere with this navigation. Craft particularly avoid Diablo Canyon, even if we put something they really want there.”

So, this Dijkstra’s algorithm and Diablo Canyon.

I can find not one single prior reference to this anywhere, ever, in all of Ufology prior to that Reddit post.

I think this is entirely new, or new to the Internet for UFO topics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dijkstra%27s_algorithm

In a 3D version of Dijkstra’s algorithm, the algorithm extends from two-dimensional plane navigation to three-dimensional environments, making it suitable for applications such as drone flight paths, underwater vehicle navigation, or spacecraft trajectory planning. The algorithm begins at a starting node, exploring all neighboring nodes and continuously updating the shortest known distances from the start to each node, considering all possible paths. By repeating this process until the destination node is reached, the algorithm ensures that the path with the minimal total distance or cost is selected, taking into account the complexities of moving through 3D space. So, we have the introduction of a known means of navigation, that does 4D (by inclusion of a temporal parameter) mapping in this model.

Then we have the inclusion of Diablo Canyon — but there are six of these in North America. Three of these are very close to government sites.

Diablo Canyon Power Plant, California (nuclear) Nearest government: Vandenburg AFB, 35 miles south. Diablo Canyon, New Mexico Los Alamos National Laboratory, 20 miles north. Diablo Canyon, Washington Naval Air Station Whidbey Island, 70 miles northwest. Diablo Canyon, British Columbia, Canada Diablo Canyon, Utah Canyon Diablo, Arizona

Which could the leaker be talking about? And why is it interesting in the context of UFOs?

Why would a UFO avoid a canyon?

2. Energy fields, UFO navigation and “fault lines” in gravity.

There are numerous reports and stories of things like claimed lasers, directed energy weapons/fields, and even allegedly things like RADAR having some manner of detecable impact on navigational capabilities of UFOs/NHI craft. The lore is full of this topic over time, and it aligns substantially with the scientific backgrounds of people known to be involved, like Sean M. Kirkpatrick.

This caught my eye as I’ve been doing a lot of reading on certain much lesser-known effects of fault lines, after I learned that the home and neighborhood I lived in as a child, where a group of us saw a “saucer”, was literally sat atop a small land mass completely encircled like an island by fault lines. This is not unique–there are others. But this was a wild surprise to me, and especially when the flight path of the ship we saw… once I saw the fault lines path/heading…

It was the same route. The thing we saw, once I saw the fault line maps… it was like looking at a snippet of a Google Maps route that the UFO took, for the duration of our experience seeing it. I did not know this for decades.

For the curious, the bread crumb that led down this path was not this whistleblower, fault lines, or my own experience. It was studying Lagrange Points.

What’s a Lagrange point?

Positions in space where the gravitational forces of two large bodies, like Earth and the Moon, balance out the centripetal force felt by a smaller object, allowing it to remain in a stable position relative to the two larger bodies. Think of it like the mid-way point between any two bodies with mass that impact gravity. Earth/Jupiter. Jupiter/Sun. Earth moon/Neptune. You/your cat. It’s not a 50/50 thing; if you are and your cat are 10 feet away, it’s not 5-foot between you. It’s also impacted by gravity from other bodies within range (and range is infinite because gravity is, no matter how infinitesimal at long distances).

There is even conceptually such a place, even if it’s trivial in variation, between galaxies.

Keep in mind: there are specifically named 3D mapped always-moving (as Earth/moon for example) always-in-motion Lagrange points for the Earth and Moon. Five total–but those are just the optimal ones. There would be a relative band of space where overall the gravity between bodies is more balanced.

Almost like a fault line in gravity, huh?

That, the fault line discovery related to my experience, and my (then) unrelated fault line research which was pure curiosity unrelated to UFOs… at first.

3. Piezoelectrics, Electrokinetics, and Gravitational anomalies.

So we have a new claimed 4D mapping/navigational tool by NHI UFOs, and that they go out of their way to avoid some “Diablo canyon” no matter what we do. We know definitively there are places where gravity can have relative weak spots, due to the balancing of gravitational waves/forces/mass between bodies. All bodies with mass produce gravity… including tectonic plates.

But that’s not all they produce in terms of energy.

Fault lines can generate three different distinct effects beyond seismic (shaking/motion) impacts on the world.

They are:

Stress-induced Piezoelectric Effects

Stress-induced piezoelectric effects refer to the generation of electrical charges in certain crystalline materials, such as quartz, when mechanical stress is applied. These effects are caused by tectonic stress and strain in the Earth’s crust, which deforms the crystalline structures, generating electric fields. At the surface, these effects can disrupt local power grids, cause voltage fluctuations, and affect sensitive electronic equipment. In the atmosphere, piezoelectric effects can lead to changes in the ionosphere, affecting radio signal propagation and GPS accuracy up to altitudes of around 600 km. In space, the impacts are typically observed as changes in ionospheric electron density, detected by satellites in low Earth orbit (LEO), such as those at altitudes up to 1,200 km.

Additional reading:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piezoelectricity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seismoelectrical_method

Electrokinetic Effects

Electrokinetic effects are electrical phenomena that occur when a fluid (such as groundwater) moves through a porous medium (like soil or rock) under the influence of a pressure gradient. These effects are caused by the movement of ionized fluids through the Earth’s subsurface, which can be influenced by tectonic activity, fluid injection, or natural fluid migration. At the surface, electrokinetic effects can alter groundwater flow, impact water supply systems, and cause electrical disturbances in subsurface sensors. In the atmosphere, these effects are less direct but can influence humidity and ionization levels, which may affect weather radar and communication systems. In space, electrokinetic effects are typically not directly observed; however, related ionospheric disturbances from fluid movement in the Earth’s crust can be detected by satellites at altitudes up to 1,200 km.

Additional reading:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetotellurics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrokinetic_phenomena

Gravity Anomalies

Gravity anomalies are variations in the Earth’s gravitational field caused by differences in the distribution of mass within the Earth. These anomalies are caused by subsurface geological structures such as mountains, valleys, fault lines, and varying rock densities. On the surface, gravity anomalies can affect precise geodetic measurements, influence surveying accuracy, and impact construction projects that rely on gravitational data. In the atmosphere, gravity anomalies can slightly influence the flight paths of aircraft and atmospheric satellites, but these effects are generally minimal. In space, gravity anomalies are detected by satellites like the GRACE mission at altitudes of around 500 km, affecting satellite orbit calculations and providing data on Earth’s subsurface structures and water distribution.

Additional reading:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_anomaly https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bouguer_anomaly https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-air_gravity_anomaly

4. The impact of fault lines on UFOs.

Disturbances related to stress-induced piezoelectric effects, electrokinetic effects, and gravity anomalies have been observed and recorded at various altitudes. Here are some notable examples across different categories:

A) Stress-induced Piezoelectric Effects

High-altitude Observations: Piezoelectric effects typically influence ground-based systems such as power grids and sensors. There is limited data on their direct impact at high altitudes. However, atmospheric electrical phenomena, such as changes in the ionosphere related to seismic activity, have been noted up to several hundred kilometers above the Earth’s surface. These are often detected by satellites in low Earth orbit.

B) Electrokinetic Effects

High-altitude Observations: Electrokinetic effects primarily affect subsurface and near-surface fluid dynamics. There is no significant evidence of direct electrokinetic phenomena being observed at high altitudes. However, related atmospheric effects, such as changes in humidity or ionization, can indirectly influence atmospheric layers.

C) Gravity Anomalies

High-altitude Observations: Gravity anomalies have been detected at high altitudes, including by aircraft and satellites. Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellites, for example, operate at altitudes of approximately 500 km and have provided detailed maps of gravity anomalies across the Earth.

Specific High-altitude Observations

Ionospheric Disturbances Related to Seismic Activity:

Altitude: Up to 600 km. Impact: Changes in electron density in the ionosphere, detected by satellites.

Gravity Anomalies Detected by GRACE Satellites:

Altitude: Approximately 500 km. Impact: Detailed mapping of Earth’s gravity field, revealing variations due to tectonic and other geological processes.

Summary

Stress-induced Piezoelectric Effects: Up to ionospheric altitudes (~600 km) via indirect atmospheric electrical phenomena. Electrokinetic Effects: Primarily near-surface, with no significant direct high-altitude observations. Gravity Anomalies: Up to satellite altitudes (~500 km), with significant observations by GRACE and similar missions.

Reports say that the navigational apparatus of UFOs can be impacted by energy fields, implying this plays a role in their crashing. Similar claims revolved around electromagnetic fields.

5. Why would UFOs avoid “Diablo Canyon”?

We need to know which one it is. The most likely based on the intersection of fault lines; fault lines with impacts; and near proximity to notable UFO-related locations–Vandenburg and Los Alamos–leaves us with New Mexico and the nuclear power planet.

Here are all nearby relevant fault lines for each.

This section took a substantial amount of digging/cross referencing over weeks. I had begun this for a fiction/story idea that didn’t pan out, and did not save the litany of sources I read. This is a summary.

A) Diablo Canyon Power Plant, California

Hosgri Fault Zone

Location: Offshore, running parallel to the coast near the power plant. Stress-induced Piezoelectric Effects Specific Locations: Documented near Avila Beach and Montaña de Oro State Park. Relative Strength: Moderate compared to other equivalent faults in California, such as the San Andreas Fault. The presence of quartz in the fault gouge enhances the piezoelectric effect, making it comparable to effects observed in the Garlock Fault. Electrokinetic Effects Specific Locations: Recorded near Diablo Canyon Power Plant and Morro Bay. Relative Strength: Comparable to electrokinetic effects seen in the Hayward Fault in California due to similar fluid movement dynamics. Gravity Anomalies Specific Locations: Detected offshore near Point Buchon and Diablo Canyon Power Plant. Relative Strength: Significant compared to other coastal fault zones, with variations similar to those found in the Cascadia Subduction Zone.

San Andreas Fault

Location: Approximately 10 miles inland from the power plant at its closest point. Stress-induced Piezoelectric Effects Specific Locations: Parkfield, California and Hollister, California. Relative Strength: High, as the San Andreas Fault is one of the most studied and active fault lines globally. The piezoelectric effects are significant and comparable to those seen in other major fault systems worldwide. Electrokinetic Effects Specific Locations: San Juan Bautista, California and Carrizo Plain National Monument. Relative Strength: Significant, due to extensive fluid movement and high seismic activity. Comparable to effects observed in the Wasatch Fault Zone. Gravity Anomalies Specific Locations: Palmdale, California and San Bernardino, California. Relative Strength: Very high, with anomalies providing critical insights into fault mechanics. Similar to those in the New Madrid Seismic Zone.

Shoreline Fault

Location: Discovered in 2008, runs very close to the plant, offshore and parallel to the coastline. Length: Approximately 25 miles. Within 5 miles: The Shoreline Fault comes within 5 miles of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant. Stress-induced Piezoelectric Effects Specific Locations: Nearshore areas close to Diablo Canyon Power Plant. Relative Strength: Potential effects are moderate, with less documentation compared to major faults. Electrokinetic Effects Specific Locations: Offshore areas near the power plant. Relative Strength: Comparable to minor faults in coastal regions. Gravity Anomalies Specific Locations: Offshore near Diablo Cove. Relative Strength: Minor, indicating subtle density changes.

Los Osos Fault

Location: Within 10 miles of the power plant. Stress-induced Piezoelectric Effects Specific Locations: Los Osos Valley. Relative Strength: Minor compared to major faults but notable within the local context. Electrokinetic Effects Specific Locations: Areas with significant groundwater flow near Los Osos. Relative Strength: Comparable to small, groundwater-rich fault zones. Gravity Anomalies Specific Locations: Los Osos Valley. Relative Strength: Minor anomalies detected.

B) Diablo Canyon, New Mexico

Embudo Fault

Location: Within 20 miles of Diablo Canyon. Stress-induced Piezoelectric Effects Specific Locations: Near Dixon and Pilar, New Mexico. Relative Strength: Moderate compared to other faults in the Rio Grande Rift. Similar effects to those observed in the East African Rift. Electrokinetic Effects Specific Locations: Near Embudo, New Mexico. Relative Strength: Moderate, consistent with other active rift zones with significant groundwater interaction. Gravity Anomalies Specific Locations: Near the town of Española, New Mexico. Relative Strength: Significant, providing insight into the rift’s complex tectonic structure. Comparable to anomalies in the Basin and Range Province.

Pajarito Fault

Location: Within 20 miles of Diablo Canyon. Stress-induced Piezoelectric Effects Specific Locations: Near Los Alamos, New Mexico. Relative Strength: High, due to active seismicity and the presence of stress. Electrokinetic Effects Specific Locations: Near White Rock, New Mexico. Relative Strength: Significant, due to active groundwater flow in the region. Gravity Anomalies Specific Locations: Near Los Alamos National Laboratory. Relative Strength: Notable, with detailed mapping providing insights into fault mechanics.

6. Conclusion

Simply, some variables on the navigational systems of the UFO craft which rely on precise 4-dimensional mapping for their navigational system, with implied near real time adjustments across all parameters, are negatively impacted by unexpected or significant enough to not be able to compensate for impacts from native Earth effects generated by tectonic plate actions, in specific key locations.

I’d often suspected if there was something like this related to the handful of known crashes, and them seeming to be concentrated in certain areas. With this leaker, we see another few possible pieces of a puzzle filling.

Are they legitimate? We obviously can’t tell, today. But this new data sure does align with:

Reports of the USA trying to “bait” UFOs. Reports of the USA utilizing nuclear facilities to this end. UFO engagement with nuclear sites. UFOs reportedly avoiding certain areas, not limited to prior crash locations. UFOs reportedly being seen over time in the same places or repeated routes/locations. The USA getting big into gravity research along these lines (gravity scanners for military). Elizondo references to LIGO. And more beyond, that I’m sure more of you can recite from memory than I could.

Maybe this has some part of the genesis of the mythology of ley lines, because ancient humans couldn’t possibly on their own know all these things. Were they just energetically charged fault lines that had some manner of intersection over time with UFOs?

If anyone wants to run with this or research equivalent sites in other parts of the world and their intersection with UFOs/UAPs, this may be a worthwhile rabbit hole for pursuit.

submitted by /u/PyroIsSpai
[link] [comments] 

Read More