The Disclosure Party Feed

submitted by /u/MartianMaterial [link] [comments]

This past week in Disclosure: May 6 – Rep. Grothman reveals he hasn’t been approached regarding plans for an upcoming hearing on UAP/USOs Rep. Glenn Grothman – Chair, House Oversight National Security, the Border, & Foreign Affairs Subcommittee – seemed to be unaware of Rep. Luna/Burchett’s intention to host a public hearing on UAP (with a specific focus on USO, i.e. Unidentified Submerged Objects). Matt Laslo: “You know I’m gonna ask about UAPs. So I heard that UAP Caucus, [Reps.] Burchett and Luna, have a former Navy…” Glenn Grothman: “Have what?” ML: “Have a Navy pilot they wanna bring in for the open hearing.” GG: “They haven’t talked to me about it.” May 7 – HASC Chair Mike Rogers denies gutting the Schumer-Rounds UAP amendment Speaking with Askapol, Rep. Rogers (who some commentators blamed for the watering down of the UAP amendment language in late 2023) denied these allegations. ML: “Was curious: do you know what happened toChuck Schumer’s UAP amendment in the NDAA last year? Was that you who was working on the reforms?” MR: “No, it wasn’t me working on it. I can’t remember. I can’t remember how it ended up.” ML: “Was it Turner — Chair Turner?” MR: “I don’t remember. I mean, I just don’t.” May 9 – the Hill publishes an article covering Senatorial interest in the UAP topic An opinion piece on the Hill covers the efforts various top Senators have made to investigate purported UAP crash retrieval/reverse engineering programs since 2011. The Senators include former fighter pilot and famed astronaut John Glenn (D-Ohio); Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), who observed a UFO as a World War II pilot; Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii), then-chairman of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense; 2008 GOP presidential nominee Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.); Senate Intelligence Vice Chairman Marco Rubio (R-Fla.); Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and Joe Lieberman (D-Conn.). May 9 – Rep. Burchett indicates plenty of work on the UAP topic is still going on behind the scenes In a post from James Fox, Rep. Burchett confirmed that “we will be having some more [UAP-related] hearings, and we will be getting some more stuff out”. May 10 – Ross Coulthart indicates the ICIG investigation into David Grusch is still ongoing In his most recent podcast appearance, Ross Coulthart claims an active ICIG investigation into David Grusch’s UAP-related allegations is still underway. Some of Grusch’s “informant base” have allegedly recently been questioned by the IC Inspector General. May 11 – AARO confirms it has yet to receive information on ‘Drone’ incursions over Langley Air Force Base As covered in the latest article from the Liberation Times, a spokesman from AARO (the Pentagon’s UFO office) stated that the office “has not yet received a report or any information on this incident.” The incident in question involved mysterious ‘drone’ swarms that harangued Langley Air Force Base throughout December 2023. “The installation first observed UAS [uncrewed aerial systems] activities the evening of December 6 [2023] and experienced multiple incursions throughout the month of December. The number of UASs fluctuated and they ranged in size/configuration. None of the incursions appeared to exhibit hostile intent but anything flying in our restricted airspace can pose a threat to flight safety. The FAA was made aware of the UAS incursions.” Things to look out for in the near future: May According to Senator Gillibrand – a public hearing in line with AARO’s latest report can be expected soon, saying –”I’ll probably have another hearing aligned with that public report.” Beyond/currently unknown Following the UAP hearing on the 26th of July, Members of Congress have called for a select committee with subpoena authority, to “go about the task of collecting information from the Pentagon and elsewhere” on unidentified flying objects. There have been conflicting messages from various Members of Congress on whether this is likely to happen anytime soon. Note – a select subcommittee was formally requested on March 13th. Reps. Moskowitz, Luna, and Burchett have repeatedly stated their intent to hold field hearings to overcome stonewalling from the Pentagon and military establishment”I think we [Congress] should try to get into one of these places [housing UAP evidence]…and if they won’t let us in I think we should have a field hearing right outside the building…and the military will have to explain why that is.” – Rep. Moskowitz (D)It is currently unknown when exactly we might expect that to occur, however as of Jan 12 – Rep. Luna confirmed:”I feel confident that we have enough evidence to move forward with our first field hearing. . We will be announcing details soon.” Several journalists have indicated that first-hand witnesses of the alleged UAP legacy programs are in the process of providing testimony/evidence to the relevant authorities (e.g. the IC IG) and/or are on the verge of making public statements in the near future (Example 1, example 2, example 3, example 4) David Grusch has received additional clearances through DOPSR to discuss some of his (alleged) first-hand knowledge of Legacy programs. He has mentioned he may be covering more of this information in an upcoming Op-Ed Some commentators have speculated that the architects of the UAPDA (e.g. Sens. Schumer/Rounds et al) are working diligently behind the scenes to continue furthering serious legislative UAP transparency efforts Skimmed through this post but need a quick refresher on how we got to this point? Check out this handy Disclosure Timeline to get up to speed. This past week in Disclosure: May 6 – Rep. Grothman reveals he hasn’t been approached regarding plans for an upcoming hearing on UAP/USOs Rep. Glenn Grothman – Chair, House Oversight National Security, the Border, & Foreign Affairs Subcommittee – seemed to be unaware of Rep. Luna/Burchett’s intention to host a public hearing on UAP (with a specific focus on USO, i.e. Unidentified Submerged Objects). May 7 – HASC Chair Mike Rogers denies gutting the Schumer-Rounds UAP amendment Speaking with Askapol, Rep. Rogers (who some commentators blamed for the watering down of the UAP amendment language in late 2023) denied these allegations. May 9 – the Hill publishes an article covering Senatorial interest in the UAP topic An opinion piece on the Hill covers the efforts various top Senators have made to investigate purported UAP crash retrieval/reverse engineering programs since 2011. The Senators include former fighter pilot and famed astronaut John Glenn (D-Ohio); Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), who observed a UFO as a World War II pilot; Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii), then-chairman of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense; 2008 GOP presidential nominee Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.); Senate Intelligence Vice Chairman Marco Rubio (R-Fla.); Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and Joe Lieberman (D-Conn.). May 9 – Rep. Burchett indicates plenty of work on the UAP topic is still going on behind the scenes In a post from James Fox, Rep. Burchett confirmed that “we will be having some more [UAP-related] hearings, and we will be getting some more stuff out”. May 10 – Ross Coulthart indicates the ICIG investigation into David Grusch is still ongoing In his most recent podcast appearance, Ross Coulthart claims an active ICIG investigation into David Grusch’s UAP-related allegations is still underway. Some of Grusch’s “informant base” have allegedly recently been questioned by the IC Inspector General. May 11 – AARO confirms it has yet to receive information on ‘Drone’ incursions over Langley Air Force Base As covered in the latest article from the Liberation Times, a spokesman from AARO (the Pentagon’s UFO office) stated that the office “has not yet received a report or any information on this incident.” The incident in question involved mysterious ‘drone’ swarms that harangued Langley Air Force Base throughout December 2023. None of the incursions appeared to exhibit hostile intent but anything flying in our restricted airspace can pose a threat to flight safety. The FAA was made aware of the UAS incursions.” Things to look out for in the near future: May According to Senator Gillibrand – a public hearing in line with AARO’s latest report can be expected soon, saying –”I’ll probably have another hearing aligned with that public report.” Beyond/currently unknown Following the UAP hearing on the 26th of July, Members of Congress have called for a select committee with subpoena authority, to “go about the task of collecting information from the Pentagon and elsewhere” on unidentified flying objects. There have been conflicting messages from various Members of Congress on whether this is likely to happen anytime soon. Note – a select subcommittee was formally requested on March 13th. Reps. Moskowitz, Luna, and Burchett have repeatedly stated their intent to hold field hearings to overcome stonewalling from the Pentagon and military establishment”I think we [Congress] should try to get into one of these places [housing UAP evidence]…and if they won’t let us in I think we should have a field hearing right outside the building…and the military will have to explain why that is.” – Rep. Moskowitz (D)It is currently unknown when exactly we might expect that to occur, however as of Jan 12 – Rep. Luna confirmed:”I feel confident that we have enough evidence to move forward with our first field hearing. . We will be announcing details soon.” Several journalists have indicated that first-hand witnesses of the alleged UAP legacy programs are in the process of providing testimony/evidence to the relevant authorities (e.g. the IC IG) and/or are on the verge of making public statements in the near future (Example 1, example 2, example 3, example 4) David Grusch has received additional clearances through DOPSR to discuss some of his (alleged) first-hand knowledge of Legacy programs. He has mentioned he may be covering more of this information in an upcoming Op-Ed Some commentators have speculated that the architects of the UAPDA (e.g. Sens. Schumer/Rounds et al) are working diligently behind the scenes to continue furthering serious legislative UAP transparency efforts submitted by /u/disclosurediaries [link] [comments]

Dear [Congressperson’s Name], I am writing to you as a concerned constituent regarding the urgent need for transparency and disclosure concerning unidentified flying objects (UFOs). It is imperative that we address the longstanding issues of overclassification and the disinformation surrounding UFO phenomena, which have significantly hindered public understanding and government oversight. The events and testimonies surrounding UFOs, particularly those highlighted by credible sources in recent Congressional hearings, underscore the necessity for our legislative body to pursue a more aggressive stance on transparency. It is concerning that, despite substantial evidence and public interest, the discourse surrounding these phenomena continues to be mired in secrecy and misinformation. As your constituent, I urge you to support efforts that increase the transparency of government findings on UFOs and to challenge any disinformation campaigns that obstruct this goal. Our national security, as well as the integrity of our scientific and technological advancement, could benefit immensely from a clear and open examination of these phenomena. Thank you for considering this critical issue. I look forward to your support in fostering an environment where UFO-related information is accessible to the public and thoroughly examined by our policymakers. Best Regards, [Your Name] Please replace “[Congressperson’s Name]” with the specific name of the Congressperson you are writing to and “[Your Name]” with your actual name. Additionally, here’s a link to help you find and contact your elected officials: usa.gov/elected-officials. Remember to follow up in three weeks if you do not receive a response. submitted by /u/MartianMaterial [link] [comments]

Dear Senator Warner, I’ve followed your work and must say I have tremendous admiration and respect for you and your body of work over all your years in public service and political leadership. Looking at our tumultuous political climate, the threats to our democracy, rapid climate change upon us, global political instability, and the risk of large scale war breaking out in the middle east, all indications are that we are at a critical inflection point in our history. Being intimately involved with the Select Committee on Intelligence you are aware of all these things better than most I know. With such a long list of these things on a parallel track, I fear we are running out of time Globally. With all this in play, and given your powerful position on the Select Committee on Intelligence I see a path for you to make a Bold and “~Course Altering and Narrative Shifting move~” to begin to shift us down a more hopeful, and truthful path with regard to the UAP cover-up revealed by David Grusch’s House disclosure hearing last year. This cover-up (perhaps the greatest cover-up in history) by non-elected command authorities in DOD Silo Programs and Industry Contractors has gone on too long (pre-Roswell incident according to numerous of the 40 witnesses David Grusch interviewed). Perhaps you’ve already read the entirety of their Classified statements. Not discounting the importance of the financial angle, the technology ownership, or the moral oversight angle of concern, but the associated withheld technologies and their potentially Immense technological advances alone warrants serious investigation of the claims of those witnesses (clean energy generation, advanced healthcare technologies, the redefinition of a long series of physics concepts, the expansion of our worldview and the universe and our place in it, human consciousness evolution, etc. etc.). Our Senate leaders who’ve come before on this subject (Harry Reid, Daniel Inouye, John Glenn, Ted Stevens, John McCain, Joe Lieberman and many others un-named) , as well our current brave leaders on the subject of Chuck Schumer, Kirsten Gillibrand, Mike Rounds, Marco Rubio, Yourself and likewise many un-named, are and will be immensely supported in this push to get to the bottom of this and take back some control of the narrative and set us on a new course. In the abstract…It is very strange when you think about this subject, and it doesn’t not have to be a hill to die on, but it could be the one single move that could set a wide swath of changes in motion. What have we got to lose if the witnesses have as much direct firsthand knowledge as we’ve been told. Mark, my strong belief and my humble request to you is if you make the bold move to call one or more Senate Hearings with the key witnesses from David Grusch on this disclosure subject, you will go down in history as one of the most pivotal Leaders in this period of our Nation’s and perhaps the World’s history. Thank you for hearing this request Mark. Xxxxxxxxxxxxxx submitted by /u/TheTruthisStrange [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/MartianMaterial [link] [comments]