Clarification requested. Do we have confirmation that Grusch has given classified testimony to Congress?

Generate New Template

public (1567) , uap (1561) , disclosure (1383) , ufo (1296) , transparency (1220) , government (1066) , information (1011) , disinformation (943) , ufos (919) , campaign (862) , congress (769) , people (678) , phenomena (648) , national (632) , urge (586) , issue (565) , regarding (565) , unidentified (561) , security (538) , truth (506) , american (506) , support (503) , potential (498) , know (477) , trust (469) , uaps (467) , writing (462) , accountability (461) , time (424) , scientific (410) , intelligence (381) , understanding (370) , act (363) , rep (357) , members (354) , defense (331) , action (314) , efforts (311) , research (310) , committee (309) , objects (302) , related (301) , legislation (297) , house (290) , secrecy (288) , oversight (286) , template (283) , ndaa (282) , concern (280) , being (274) ,

I need help with clarification on what I think is one of the most significant and least-understood aspects of the hearing.

During the hearing Grusch testified that he was not only willing to testify further about classified matters in private, but had already done so in private with some of them.

Is my understanding correct? Do we have confirmation that his actually happened? Have members of congress confirmed this? Have there been multiple meetings? I’d like to have links to share.

I think this is one of the most crucial aspects of this whole thing and a lot of people seem to be misunderstanding it. It would help to have some definitive links to share, especially confirmation from the relevant members of congress.

submitted by /u/JohnBooty
[link] [comments] 

Read More