David Grusch testified that he prefers UAP because it can refer to “traditional extraterrestrial origin or something else”. What does “traditional” mean?

Generate New Template

public (1567) , uap (1561) , disclosure (1383) , ufo (1296) , transparency (1220) , government (1066) , information (1011) , disinformation (943) , ufos (919) , campaign (862) , congress (769) , people (678) , phenomena (648) , national (632) , urge (586) , regarding (565) , issue (565) , unidentified (561) , security (538) , truth (506) , american (506) , support (503) , potential (498) , know (477) , trust (469) , uaps (467) , writing (462) , accountability (461) , time (424) , scientific (410) , intelligence (381) , understanding (370) , act (363) , rep (357) , members (354) , defense (331) , action (314) , efforts (311) , research (310) , committee (309) , objects (302) , related (301) , legislation (297) , house (290) , secrecy (288) , oversight (286) , template (283) , ndaa (282) , concern (280) , being (274) ,

At 2 hours David Grusch differentiated between traditional extraterrestrial and something else. What does “traditional” mean in this sense? Are we dealing with a new type of NIH that we’re just learning about? Is this why they also all testified to UAPs gathering intelligence on nuclear capabilities? I just find it interesting that there may be classification of different species.

submitted by /u/recklessSPY
[link] [comments]