David Grusch’s connections to the 2023 shoot-downs are too significant and too obvious to ignore.


~4 months ago, David Grusch seemed ready to publish an Op-Ed detailing his first-hand knowledge of a secret program to track and find UAPs in our atmosphere.

What happened?

Based on the below summary, I think there’s clear evidence that either:

a) Grusch’s Op-Ed is being blocked by the Biden Administration – because it might implicitly or explicitly connect Grusch to the Feb 2023 shoot downs.

OR

b) the Op-Ed was a means for Grusch to pressure for more hearings – in other words, Grusch knew his Op-Ed would create an implicit (or even explicit) connection to Biden’s shoot downs. By implying he could involve the president (and force disclosure on him), he could at a minimum, create pressure for more hearings.

——————————————————————————————–

SUMMARY:

In July 2022, after concluding his investigative work for the UAP Task Force (as the NGA’s representative) David Grusch continued his work at the NGA as their Senior Technical Advisor for UAP/Trans-Medium Issues, and continued there until April, 2023***.***

This information leads us to conclude that David Grusch was in a critical UAP role for the NGA during the Chinese Spy Balloon Incident. As such, Biden’s order to shoot down multiple UAPs would have likely been informed by Grusch’s SME knowledge/intelligence.

Again, it bears repeating…Grusch had already concluded his UAPTF work by the time of the shoot downs.

So, now imagine what would happen if Grusch was allowed to release his Op-Ed – which planned to discuss his UAP role at the NGA. Even if he only scratched the surface of discussing his UAP role, anyone (with half a brain) could tie Grusch’s UAP-related responsibilities to the February 2023 Spy Balloon incident & shoot downs.

Therefore, if published, this Op-Ed would clearly show Grusch’s direct tie to the Biden Administration’s detection of, and decision to shoot down multiple UAPs. This tie would likely force the Biden Administration to further acknowledge and answer questions about the shoot downs. Specifically:

the still inconclusive whereabouts and details of the multiple non-spy balloon/craft shot down in Feb 2023. Addressing Grusch’s claims of an SAP UAP detection program, and its ongoing ability to detect UAP craft before & after the February 2023 shoot downs The Administrations knowledge of all detected and recovered technology during the Feb 2023 period, as well as the number and details of detections/shoot downs/retrievals up to the present day.

Clearly, if Grusch really wanted to release an Op-Ed, Biden would have EVERY reason to block it. Not only would it put a burning spotlight on him during an election campaign, but in this scenario – where Grusch discloses this information first – Biden would look like he’s part of the disclosure problem, rather than part of the solution.

So, even if Biden is pro-disclosure (which I believe he is), this is a terrible look; not only for the election, but for disclosure at-large.

So, was Grusch really planning to release the Op-Ed? If so, is he being blocked by the Biden Administration? Or did Grusch know the prickly position this would put Biden in? Therefore was his Op-Ed nothing more than a veiled threat at the possibility of catastrophic disclosure, and a way to pressure “The Congress” to hold more public hearings with more whistleblowers?

End of summary.

————————————————————————————————————————

CONNECTING THE DOTS / SEQUENCE OF EVENTS

The below sequence of events (+ quotes and testimony), illustrate a story where Grusch – fresh out of the UAPTF – continues as the UAP SME at the NGA, and is in that very role during the spy balloon event. It flew under the radar of his congressional testimony, but Grusch clearly attests to these facts during last year’s hearing.

The most significant fact – to me – is that the President was given visibility and authority to shoot down said craft…potentially making it the first time in history that shoot downs happened in such a publicized setting.

Harry Reid would be proud.

– First, let’s look at Grusch’s congressionally submitted resume:

From November 2021-April 2023, Grusch was the “Lead SME for USSPACECOM National Support Team (NST)” for cross agency program integration, and **“**the Senior Technical Advisor for UAP/Trans-Medium Issues.” https://docs.house.gov/meetings/GO/GO06/20230726/116282/HHRG-118-GO06-Bio-GruschD-20230726.pdf In other words, Grusch was a G-15 (Colonel Equiv.) in a UAP-related role when the shoot downs happened.

– We also gained valuable information from Grusch’s congressional testimony, where he stated that – in his role at the NGA – he personally reviewed NGA satellite imagery:

I personally reviewed both what we call ‘overhead collection’, and from other strategic and tactical platforms, that…I could not explain prosaically.https://youtu.be/SNgoul4vyDM?t=4140I’ve seen some of the videos from the recent shoot down, and I saw no reason that couldn’t have been released, as long as they mask some data; the American people deserve to see that imagery and full motion video.https://youtu.be/SNgoul4vyDM?t=5601

– Then, in a December 2023 interview with News Nation, Grusch now claimed:

he had “first-hand knowledge” of UAP programs, specifically saying he was “read into a UAP program directly by the US government”. Per the interview, this specific information was to be discussed in his forthcoming Op-Ed. https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/18g7snn/david_grusch_has_first_hand_knowledge_of_a_uap/

– Then, taking things further, in January 2024, Grusch presented to a private group in NYC, where he noted:

he was part of an extremely secret program that had figured out how to track and find UAP’s in our atmosphere and near earth orbit”, which seems to speak very specifically to his role at the NGA. https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/191yshx/david_grusch_first_hand_experience_he_was_part_of/

– Finally, most recently in February 2024, we heard more details from a Ross Coulthart source, that:

the Pentagon tracked the Alaska object, confirmed it was a silver cylindrical UAP, and not a balloon. The President, Joe Biden, ordered the shoot down, and multiple assets were involved with the recovery.https://youtu.be/NFvXyOiUiZ0?t=747

*For reference, here are 2 of the very few detailed news reports regarding the multiple objects shot down in February of last year (via BBC):

The BBC article (which has been moved/removed once already), outlines 3 other shoot downs… 1) “car-sized”, 2) “cylindrical”, & 3) “octagonal” https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-64620798?quot https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/4-flying-objects-shot-north-america-timeline-key/story?id=97068603 You can extrapolate for yourself which one(s) are ours – ahem, cough, Michael Herrera.

—————————————————————————–

PERSONAL THOUGHTS & THEORIES:

Over a year later, the still-mysterious spy balloon incident seems like a somewhat clever, somewhat hilarious plan to stir up public attention, and force POTUS involvement. If the POTUS reacted to a low-threat spy balloon, then – after radar apertures are “opened” – he would have to be informed of other objects as well. In other words, if the Pentagon broadened their radar sensitivities someone knew the POTUS would detect more than just a low-threat spy balloon.

In essence, the stupid balloon drew POTUS attention to the sky, and with his attention (and public attention) over multiple days, allowed him to gain visibility to the other objects in the sky, pulling them into the POTUS’s “need to know” actionable sphere: balloons, cylinders and octagons, oh my. Remember how long that balloon was floating across the USA? They KNEW they’d see something else in that time period.

It’s kind of awesome (and frankly kind of pathetic) if you think about it that way. We potentially hijacked the truth (and the radar) from our own black system…one that was holding it hostage from our own President. Hell, I wouldn’t be surprised if Schumer and Grusch – and even Biden – were all involved in executing this operation. It feels like a mission, post UAPTF findings.

To me – this is not a coincidence. To me – it’s an orchestrated mission to extract and deliver knowledge of UAP to the American people.

Finally, I encourage everyone to trace Grusch’s career from the NRO to the UAPTF to the NGA. It’s a pretty telling story…specifically how he was seemingly drawn into the UAPTF, collected intel, and then ended up being the UAP SME at the NGA when the UAP shoot downs happened.

https://thedebrief.org/intelligence-officials-say-u-s-has-retrieved-non-human-craft/

————————————————————————————————–

BIDEN & DISCLOSURE:

First, I believe that Biden was probably fully aware of what was going on…which could eventually be a great look for him. Grusch had already concluded his UAPTF work, and his testimony had likely already reached the President’s desk.

So while I think Biden – in a non-election year – would normally push this process along, and eventually disclose this information to the American public…everyone knows the rules of an election year: “kick the can”. Even if the world is crumbling before our very eyes…there’s also a wannabe 2-time autocrat on the White House doorstep…hence the “it can wait” argument.

Still, I believe wholeheartedly Biden should end this stalemate and push for more hearings (and then disclose), before someone like Grusch forces his hand, and makes him look like a fool…or even worse: make him look as if he’s part of the problem.

Finally, if you’re in the press, for God’s sake report on this material. It’s your responsibility to the American people. Please, just do your job.

Thanks for reading!

submitted by /u/InevitableCicada4278
[link] [comments] 

Read More