
“or we could be dealing with a phenomenon generated at least partly by the psyche. The supposed aliens that witnesses see within and outside of UFOs might be examples of what Dr. John Mack termed “reified metaphor”—a physical intrusion of repressed archetypal forces. If so, it’s all-too-tempting to speculate that the daimonic reality traditionally accessed by shamanic cultures has begun to spill over into waking consciousness, manifesting as a veritable onslaught of beings quietly seeking to reassert their influence. In a mechanistic society, the “Other” might find itself faced with extinction; violations of restricted airspace and faceto-face encounters with unsuspecting observers could amount to a kind of existential assertion, begging the possibility that our capacity for belief is somehow integral to our visitors’ reality”
Even Mac Tonnies, the proponent of CTH (CryptoTerrestrial Hypothesis) who doesnt approve vallee-keel approach of NHI from the other ‘realm’, considered the possibility of our sentient belief aiding the NHI and their technology manifesting in our ‘realm’.
In other words, the NHI from the other ‘realm’ need our belief for their crossover and roamaround in our ‘realm’. Does the conscious observer’s belief then do the quantum measurement breaking the ‘Veil of Duality’ between the two ‘realm’s allowing their manifestation in our realm?
Is it a survival strategy behind deliberate show off and increase in sightings since 40s (and now allegedly a green signal for even disclosure), unbelivable claims of CE5 (same as ageold invocation of spirits though) and huge media promotion into collective cultural subconscious? An upgrade on the older strategy of myth and folklore entities towards an ETH, UTH, CTH, IDH or HDH presentation with superior technology matching with contemporary human socio-cultural belief?
As our belief added to power of specific gods before, do the new age NHI also need to cash in our belief, a “Let me in” cosmic requirement to materialize?
submitted by /u/Zestyclose_Door_7508
[link] [comments]