I’ve noticed a couple of things about how the NDAA Schumer Amendment horse-trading is progressing and there is definitely something fishy going on behind the scenes with this legislation and especially the Eminent Domain clause.
i) the obvious, if there is no “there there” then why would anybody have an issue with Eminent Domain if the craft, pieces, NHI bodies, etc, etc don’t even exist? … as per the now apparently ridiculous conclusion of Kirkpatrick and AARO. The pushback against this clause is tantamount to disclosure from whoever is wanting eminent domain on UFO/ET artifacts removed … TL;DR, they ‘ET/UFO’ exist.
ii) the GoodTroubleShow’s – DailyMail article curiously has a graphic of exactly the Eminent Domain clause in the pics section captioned
“In July Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer co-sponsored a bill to allow disclosure of ‘recovered technologies of unknown origin and biological evidence of non-human intelligence'”
as if to send a message by the insider sources outing the CIA OGA and putting them on notice that the Eminent Domain clause is the cookie jar by which the MIC and “war pigs” have gotten their hands well and truly trapped in at this point. I.e. “more leaks of the same will be coming if the eminent domain clause is not enacted maybe?”
iii) the wording of the eminent domain clause is stark and unequivocal, “The Federal Government shall exercise eminent domain over any and all recovered technologies of unknown origin and biological evidence of non-human intelligence … ” so if put in place the incentive structure for the Federal Govt completely changes from colluding in dark secrecy through the CIA with private defence contractors to owning and operating NHI research and technology outright.
The clause itself would have the effect of pitting the legal might of the US Fed. Govt against the private defence contractors in a battle over ownership of UFO/ET artifacts and technology. It’s truly a play for all the marbles …
submitted by /u/marcus_of_augustus
[link] [comments]