Evidence of video editing between different sources of MH370 video

Generate New Template

public (1567) , uap (1561) , disclosure (1383) , ufo (1296) , transparency (1220) , government (1066) , information (1011) , disinformation (943) , ufos (919) , campaign (862) , congress (769) , people (678) , phenomena (648) , national (632) , urge (586) , issue (565) , regarding (565) , unidentified (561) , security (538) , truth (506) , american (506) , support (503) , potential (498) , know (477) , trust (469) , uaps (467) , writing (462) , accountability (461) , time (424) , scientific (410) , intelligence (381) , understanding (370) , act (363) , rep (357) , members (354) , defense (331) , action (314) , efforts (311) , research (310) , committee (309) , objects (302) , related (301) , legislation (297) , house (290) , secrecy (288) , oversight (286) , template (283) , ndaa (282) , concern (280) , being (274) ,

Following the recent excellent observation of the “cloud anomaly” found here https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/15osfr2/mh370_clouds_anomaly/, I decided to go through the satellite video frame by frame to see what’s going on. Surprisingly, I found that the video I had downloaded previous seemingly did not have the cloud anomaly.

Here are images before and after the “portal” taken from two different sources:

Source 1 clearly has the “cloud anomaly”

Source 2 from https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/15knra2/video_side_by_side_of_airliner/

Video from source two does not have the “cloud anomaly”

This observation implies that there may be at least two videos out there, which could be a big hit for the videos credibility. One hypothesis could be that the editor caught the mistake and fixed it in later released versions.

Can someone double check my work? It seems pretty clear to me, but maybe I missed something?

submitted by /u/anonyphysics
[link] [comments]  

Read More