Fact pattern of expert witnesses IS proof, but at some point you want a smoking gun.

When trying a court case, using a pattern of expert witnesses is *absolutely* proof.

If you have 20 people who say they all saw someone shoot someone, but you don’t have a gun or a body – that someone is still going to jail.

OF course, it’s not 100%, it’s more like 99%.

We are now at 99%. The problem is, one more expert witness is **not** going to help.

We don’t need more ‘expert witnesses’ – we need a smoking gun.

​