Forced Disclosure vs. No Disclosure

It seems evident that many politicians prioritize special interests over the interests of the general populace. This raises a crucial question: Is it better to have forced disclosure of what we know regardless of politicians’ affiliations and financial ties, even if it’s done under pressure, rather than no disclosure at all?

Forced disclosure might bring transparency, but it could also be incomplete or strategically manipulated. With all evidence reviewed simply marked as a “hoax”.

On the other hand, no disclosure leaves us in the dark about potential technological advancements, human history, a brighter future and so so so much more.

In this case, is there really a “lesser of two evils”.