Hypnotic Regression: How do you distinguish between true and false memories?

The phenomena is real, we only need the WWII cases to prove that.

If you promote hypnotic regression and/or use testimony from experiencers after they’ve undergone hypnotic regression, I’d like to hear from you.

Why do you believe that hypnotic regression can be used to extract facts that can’t be corroporated otherwise?

Of the memories that the experiencers can’t recall before afer hypnotic regression has been used, how do you establish which memeories are true and which are false?

Do you think it strengthens the credibility of the testimony after hypnotic regression has been used, or not?

Do you think witness are more or less likely to hold on to false memories if they have undergone hypnotic regression, as opposed to normal recall?

If someone educates you on hypnotic regression on social media, would you block them if it goes against your (in most cases uneducated beliefs) on hypnotic regression?