Yes, I know it’s in the daily mail. But, Christopher Sharpe has been really good at getting his facts straight on this topic and getting good sources. Let’s be real for a second, did you really think Chris Sharpe and Matt Ford were going to have been working on a NYT article? Or politico? No hate to them in any way, but they are not on that level.
Parts I found interesting
‘There’s at least nine vehicles. There were different circumstances for different ones,’ one source briefed by UFO program insiders told DailyMail.com. ‘It has to do with the physical condition they’re in. If it crashes, there’s a lot of damage done. Others, two of them, are completely intact.’
The source said the CIA has a ‘system in place that can discern UFOs while they’re still cloaked,’ and that if the ‘non-human’ craft land, crash or are brought down to earth, special military units are sent to try to salvage the wreckage.
‘They are basically a facilitator for people to get in and out of countries,’ the source said. ‘They are very clever at being able to get anywhere in the world they want to.’
One source said that the Air Force Special Operations Command’s 24th Special Tactics Squadron, based at Pope Field Army Airbase in North Carolina, has also been involved in securing areas for UFO crash retrievals. – (The names of the people who head the 24th Special Tactics Squadron are available online. However, I would like to stress that people SHOULD NOT go harassing these guys or post information about them despite being public info)
The task at hand is simply to get it into custody and protect the secrecy of it,’ one source said. ‘The actual physical retrieval is by the military. But it’s not kept under military control, because they have to keep too many records. So they start moving it out fairly quickly into private hands.’
‘The CIA is the portfolio manager or owner of the UAP [Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena] crash retrieval operation,’ one source, who has shared their information with Congress, told DailyMail.com.
‘The Department of Energy national labs are materials analysis contractors whenever recovered radioisotopes are involved but not always just radioisotope materials. The aerospace-defense industry are also contractors that specifically do not handle any recovered radioisotopes, but they handle the other non-radioactive material – and intact craft.’
I think what’s interesting is this part “Whenever recovered radioisotopes are involved but not always just radioisotope materials” (in reference to the DOE Nat Labs)
I’m claiming this is the case, but you could assume that when the source says ” but not always just radioisotope materials” I think you could make a case that if there were biological remains found, they would go to the DOE Nat labs and not somewhere like Lockheed.
I also want to remind people that Grusch felt comfortable talking about certain things in his appearance on Rogan due to the fact that they were in the public domain, like the Harry Reid interview. So it might help it to where Grusch could confirm this or at least speak on it.
Dr. Garry Nolan tweeted “This highlights the risk of suppression of information — which always wants to be ‘free’. Your sources worked on the inside and risked their careers to provide this information. An open question is what provoked them to take this risk? Understanding the psychology of this backdrop will tell you a lot about the components of how the alleged programs are operating.”
Is this definitive evidence of anything?
Obviously not, but it starts to help us put together the puzzle pieces here. And I think is a possible warning shot to the DOD that they can keep putting out information like this. Now, if they even really have more info, I dunno.
submitted by /u/thehumanbean_
[link] [comments]