I thought it would be interesting to look at another angle of this and what the secret meetings between defence contractors and these corrupt politicians might look like at the moment.
I think that they’ll be well aware that there will be a potential catastrophic disclosure if they squash the amendment, they’ll no doubt have intelligence all over that buzzword that’s going around at the moment, but in my mind I think they will believe this is their best option. They probably feel like they can take the hit if whistleblowers come out in force, where they can use media assets to squash and humiliate them and kill it as they’ve done in the past.
I feel like for them the priority will be to under no circumstances allow eminent domain of their materials, Whistleblowers can’t enact legal confiscation of materials, only the legal legislation like the current amendment can do that. Although Whistleblowers can force new legislation but I’m not sure going public will force their hand in the same way. Unless they show concrete evidence or a smoking gun.
It’s been mentioned that there are ”back up plans to back up plans” from Elizondo and co, but I do wonder if this is the big move from the defence contractors and they will take the hit on the chin if Whistleblowers come forward.
Thoughts?
submitted by /u/Drew1404
[link] [comments]