Jeremy Corbell said on the Weaponized podcast (episode w Ross Coulthart and Bryce Zabel) that he and George Gnapp essentially “negotiated / bargained for” the witnesses at the 7/26/23 Congressional hearing to be under oath. This implications that I’m not sure about

Generate New Template

public (1567) , uap (1561) , disclosure (1383) , ufo (1296) , transparency (1220) , government (1066) , information (1011) , disinformation (943) , ufos (919) , campaign (862) , congress (769) , people (678) , phenomena (648) , national (632) , urge (586) , regarding (565) , issue (565) , unidentified (561) , security (538) , truth (506) , american (506) , support (503) , potential (498) , know (477) , trust (469) , uaps (467) , writing (462) , accountability (461) , time (424) , scientific (410) , intelligence (381) , understanding (370) , act (363) , rep (357) , members (354) , defense (331) , action (314) , efforts (311) , research (310) , committee (309) , objects (302) , related (301) , legislation (297) , house (290) , secrecy (288) , oversight (286) , template (283) , ndaa (282) , concern (280) , being (274) ,

See YT link below to podcast episode I’m referencing

https://youtu.be/t2xSFMkmWg4

I think getting the witnesses under oath was huge, but there are so many other questions or issues that are baked into this aspect of the hearing according to Corbell

1- why did getting the witnesses’ testimony under oath have to be bargained for in the first place? What individuals or groups involved in planning the 7/26/23 public hearing would be against that option? Why would they be against it? Is the fact that they were against it, in part, a confirmation of that there is a “there” there?

2- the fact that Corbell says this was a negotiated agreement means Corbell has some cache of leverage that we are not fully aware of, and that by itself is interesting. How did Jeremy Corbell of all people acquire / wield such leverage in the first place? What does he have up his sleeve that is forcing the DOD’s hand in some of these back room planning meetings and conversations ?

submitted by /u/bluff2085
[link] [comments]