Ken Klippenstein polls for opinions on his article

Generate New Template

public (1567) , uap (1561) , disclosure (1383) , ufo (1296) , transparency (1220) , government (1066) , information (1011) , disinformation (943) , ufos (919) , campaign (862) , congress (769) , people (678) , phenomena (648) , national (632) , urge (586) , regarding (565) , issue (565) , unidentified (561) , security (538) , truth (506) , american (506) , support (503) , potential (498) , know (477) , trust (469) , uaps (467) , writing (462) , accountability (461) , time (424) , scientific (410) , intelligence (381) , understanding (370) , act (363) , rep (357) , members (354) , defense (331) , action (314) , efforts (311) , research (310) , committee (309) , objects (302) , related (301) , legislation (297) , house (290) , secrecy (288) , oversight (286) , template (283) , ndaa (282) , concern (280) , being (274) ,

​

Ken is asking the public on Twitter (or whatever it likes to go by now) on if he should have published his… highly controversial… article.

The stigma against Veterans dealing with PTSD is absurd. Veteran suicide statistics are extremely depressing, with 6,146 veteran suicides in 2020 alone (16.8 per day): https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/data-sheets/2022/2022-National-Veteran-Suicide-Prevention-Annual-Report-FINAL-508.pdf

My opinion was that he wrote an article with a bias that Grusch is crazy and lying, and used his previous PTSD incident to justify this bias.

This is completely irrelevant towards Grusch’s claims and only promotes the negative stigma towards PTSD. Yet Ken did it anyways.

Is there another perspective I’m missing?

submitted by /u/Careless-Car_
[link] [comments]  

​Read More