Let’s have a debate on whether or not NASA has been nefariously lying to public and covering up scientific discoveries that they’ve made using tax payer money, which involves the detection of UFOs, technosignatures and biosignatures.

Generate New Template

public (1567) , uap (1561) , disclosure (1383) , ufo (1296) , transparency (1220) , government (1066) , information (1011) , disinformation (943) , ufos (919) , campaign (862) , congress (769) , people (678) , phenomena (648) , national (632) , urge (586) , regarding (565) , issue (565) , unidentified (561) , security (538) , truth (506) , american (506) , support (503) , potential (498) , know (477) , trust (469) , uaps (467) , writing (462) , accountability (461) , time (424) , scientific (410) , intelligence (381) , understanding (370) , act (363) , rep (357) , members (354) , defense (331) , action (314) , efforts (311) , research (310) , committee (309) , objects (302) , related (301) , legislation (297) , house (290) , secrecy (288) , oversight (286) , template (283) , ndaa (282) , concern (280) , being (274) ,

One of the main implication of disclosure is that the trust in publicly funded scientific institutions such as NASA would be diminished almost instantly, as there is absolutely no logic in them not knowing about what’s going on considering the many Earth facing and non-Earth facing instrumentation that have in orbit to monitor things on and off the planet. This infers that they’re been lying and covering up scientific discoveries from the public, but also from the scientists and institutions that rely on them for data to carry out their research. Most people who hold NASA in the highest regards would be in total ontological shock that they would in fact engage in such things, and it would most likely lead to a total collapse in trust of the organisation.

submitted by /u/subatmoiclogicgate
[link] [comments] 

Read More