Occam’s Razor doesn’t cut it

Generate New Template

public (1567) , uap (1561) , disclosure (1383) , ufo (1296) , transparency (1220) , government (1066) , information (1011) , disinformation (943) , ufos (919) , campaign (862) , congress (769) , people (678) , phenomena (648) , national (632) , urge (586) , regarding (565) , issue (565) , unidentified (561) , security (538) , truth (506) , american (506) , support (503) , potential (498) , know (477) , trust (469) , uaps (467) , writing (462) , accountability (461) , time (424) , scientific (410) , intelligence (381) , understanding (370) , act (363) , rep (357) , members (354) , defense (331) , action (314) , efforts (311) , research (310) , committee (309) , objects (302) , related (301) , legislation (297) , house (290) , secrecy (288) , oversight (286) , template (283) , ndaa (282) , concern (280) , being (274) ,

 Read More 

What is the point in providing any amount of evidence as it relates to UAPs (or any event for that matter) if we discard it out of hand because we feel that it is implausible?

It seems that even if we have multiple videos from trusted sources, it is easy enough to say “Well, which is more likely, that these sources worked together to pull a prank, or that aliens from a bazillion light years away decided to visit Earth”?

Our feelings about how likely something is or is not to occur have no place in science. We have what we have today because science replaced our gut feelings about the natural world.

Now, I am not saying that there is a burden on anyone to disprove something. However, when efforts to disprove something come up short, our gut feeling of “this would be unlikely to occur” should be given very, very little weight.

submitted by /u/Old_Court9173
[link] [comments]