K.I.S.S.
Keep it simple, shithead.
The inundation of information that we as a community absorb, would be extremely difficult for a embedded ufologist with 20 years experience to follow, much less a “freelance investigator” with other obligations like family and/or a steady 9 to 5. Additionally, it is a widely known fact that disinfo and red herrings are introduced with the specific intention to sow distrust and create distraction. Knowing this, I feel we could all benefit from some simplicity.
The Schumer amendment to the NDAA was added, as far as I understand it, UNANIMOUSLY. I’m not aware of that ever occurring for any bill. The lawmakers were shown something that galvanized them into action. Now apparently some have changed their stance. Why? Is the “threat” gone now? I am ready to admit that I may be misunderstanding something but from where I sit, nothing is making sense. It is my sincere hope that a journalist with access to the relevant authorities, (like Ford, Sharp, Lazlo) presents the following SIMPLE query: Is there or is there not – an adversary of unknown origin in the space domain(or any domain for that matter) with which an engagement had occurred?
This whole subject has been complicated and convoluted beyond all recognition. I think we could all benefit from some simplicity.
submitted by /u/tgloser
[link] [comments]