I’m relatively new to the topic of UAPs and I’ve been looking into the subject and researching as much as I can. I’ve run into a lot of frustration however as the Roswell incident, which is arguably the first major UAP event (excluding Magenta Italy crash) was in the late forties nearly 80 years ago. Since then there have been thousands of alleged UAP sightings, many whistleblowers, bold claims and statements such as craft as big as football fields, galactic federations etc.
Despite all of these incidents and events there are less than 6 individual photographic shots that I have deemed significant. You can bet on a random UAP video being blurry, faked or focused an indistinguishable object, even for the Pentagon released videos and images.
I watched a NASA press conference where they said these UAP sightings like the metallic orb (one of the most significant UAP videos I’ve seen) are regular and routine. So how is it that we barely have footage of them? And when we do why is it so bad?
This shouldn’t be an issue though, with enough people seeing these things, sometimes multiple people, there should be some sort of whistleblower or person with irrefutable proof? I looked into the Melbourne UAP flying saucer event where schoolchildren, teachers and some people in the town saw a flying disk. However shortly after the army shows up, cordoned off the area, the patch of grass where the craft had landed and left scorch marks was covered up and the grass trimmed.
This is where shit starts pissing me off as it was the same story in Roswell and similar for other incidents. There were threats made by the so called “men in black” to witnesses not to tell anyone what they saw. I watched a documentary that talks about a girl (witness of Roswell) having a man show up to her house in the middle of the night with a baseball bat telling her and her mother they didn’t see anything.
More anger and frustration. I’m starting to find the cover up of UAPs more fascinating than the UAPs themselves. I dare say I’m impressed at the efficiency of this alleged shadow government in keeping this under wraps for years, we’re seeing the same thing now with the NDAA disclosure act. Somehow it manages to slip through your fingers, however close you felt you were.
How is it that none of the people who have irrefutable proof have shown it to the world? I did see someone say that the proof is there but people just don’t believe it. I don’t know. I feel like there must be something that can be revealed which is irrefutable evidence. But as I said I’ve only seen very very few.
I’ve heard alot of people excited about catastrophic disclosure. I don’t share the excitement. All I see is claims and no evidence. History tells me that this catastrophic disclosure won’t live up to its expectations. A few more whistleblowers with unsubstantiated claims, a few more blurry videos.
But I’m not all doom and gloom. I’m excited for this Grusch SCIF. I’m hoping it could shed some more light as to what we’re dealing with. I’m taking a break from following all this UAP stuff closely but I’ll keep an eye out for major developments.
submitted by /u/1llu1sive5
[link] [comments]