
As the title suggests. Healthy skepticism is something that’s often in short supply around here, and I always like to view these events from the eyes of both skeptics and believers. But this time, I’m having trouble finding an argument for why the government would want to block this amendment which only really affects them (I think, but could be wrong) if technology from non human origin is found to be in the government’s possession?
submitted by /u/EddieDean9Teen
[link] [comments]