Yesterday this was posted claiming that Stephen Bassett had predicted disclosure directly after Grusch testified to the house oversight and accountability subcommittee. It was even in the quote they supplied in the post:

Once they get the witnesses to testify, which would almost certainly include Grusch and anybody else prepared to testify directly to ET technology in our hands, which means Roswell was real, which Grusch has alluded to—two weeks.

Bolding my addition. Clearly Mr. Bassett meant that once we have first hand witnesses testify under oath to their first-hand knowledge, THEN two weeks later we will get disclosure. That isn’t even a particularly controversial statement and hardly qualifies as any sort of prediction.

It’s disappointing that reading comprehension of such a low level passes as content in this sub. There’s a lesson here if you choose to learn from this.

submitted by /u/iWantURDog
[link] [comments] 

Read More