Steve Bassett: I have spoken directly with Cong. Tim Burchett. It was a pleasant and revealing discussion. I have received other input as well. Here is info.
1) Cong. Burchett’s amendment was not intended to replace the UAP Disclosure Act. Rather, it was to provide some more direct language to augment the extremely complex Senate bill.
2) Cong. Burchett does have issues with the Senate bill. They are honest disagreements.
3) The UAP Disclosure Act will pass, but there is an intense effort to change the language. As mentioned earlier the areas of engagement are the eminent domain section, subpoena powers and the UAP Review board. Politics is always about compromise.
4) Continue to lobby for the UAP act to pass as is. But the one area you should not want to see removed is the White House UAP Review Board. Focus on that.
5) The press conference on Thursday was an authentic effort to demand an end to the abuse of secrecy and the Truth Embargo.
Really important update. Just adding characters now xyz.xyz.
Now replacing garbage characters by some thoughts: Let’s not stop increasing everyone’s awareness about this issue. It’s time to gamble some of our reputation and to have the courage to stand for what we believe in even more (and respectfully so). Let’s get our voices heard and keep people looking at this topic using critical thinking.
submitted by /u/SharinganGlasses
[link] [comments]