Without showing the Metadata that indicates the GPS location/azimuth of the crosshairs, or a clock it is impossible to determine if this footage is actually a drone rotating around a fixed object.
In this case I would suspect the “fixed object” is a balloon covered in some stringy-looking apparatus, and anchored to the ground with some small string. Meanwhile a drone in IR is flying a 360 orbit around the object.
The lack of a GPS clock allows the owner of this video to speed it up to the point to make it appear as if the camera is fixed and the object is moving.
The thermal conversion accounts for the changing color of the object (and also, but less noticeable the objects in the background).
The zooming in and out makes it difficult to observe any thing in the background that would indicate this is a fake (such as noticing the orientation of vehicles, objects or infrastructure rotating inconsistently with what you would see if the object was moving but the camera was fixes.
I’m normally a big Jeremy Corbell fan, but I think he got duped here. I hope he either realizes the Metadata, atleast the clock and azimuth, or open up to the potential that he was wrong on this one.
For what it’s worth I thought this was the real deal on the first 2 looks.
submitted by /u/OkPark4061
[link] [comments]