The lack of high quality evidence is being driven by the phenomena itself. What can we do about this disturbing aspect?

The objects my father and I witnessed in 2008 were able to remotely interfere with our diving camera and corrupt the SD card. During that sighting, I was compelled to go back to bed and woke up the next morning with zero memory of making it back to my bedroom the night before. Whatever this phenomena is, I confidently believe that it’s able to evade or obfuscate our attempts to observe it. It’s disturbing to realise that this ability isn’t just limited to technological interference, but also behavioural & psychological interference.

How are we supposed to collect high quality evidence of something that has the ability to manipulate us into looking the other way, and even if we do get a glimpse, it can interfere with our measuring equipment? After my own personal experience, I’m now of the opinion that the cases which include irrational witness behaviour and poor imaging quiality are actually more likely to be the real phenomena – which obviously makes it incredibly difficult to discuss with others. What, if anything, is the solution to this?