The “Reminder, THIS video is NOT CGI” post IS ACTUALLY CGI. Here’s the proof.

Generate New Template

public (1567) , uap (1561) , disclosure (1383) , ufo (1296) , transparency (1220) , government (1066) , information (1011) , disinformation (943) , ufos (919) , campaign (862) , congress (769) , people (678) , phenomena (648) , national (632) , urge (586) , regarding (565) , issue (565) , unidentified (561) , security (538) , truth (506) , american (506) , support (503) , potential (498) , know (477) , trust (469) , uaps (467) , writing (462) , accountability (461) , time (424) , scientific (410) , intelligence (381) , understanding (370) , act (363) , rep (357) , members (354) , defense (331) , action (314) , efforts (311) , research (310) , committee (309) , objects (302) , related (301) , legislation (297) , house (290) , secrecy (288) , oversight (286) , template (283) , ndaa (282) , concern (280) , being (274) ,

19 hours ago, /u/BEERD0UGH made a post about a spaceX rocket in which he claims that the entire clip is “not CGI”. However, that is demonstrably FALSE.

Post I’m referring to: https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/15ltrut/reminder_this_video_is_not_cgi/

Now, 90% of the video is not CGI. But the clip from 1:14-1:26 IS CGI, and here is why:

In 1:14-1:26 we see a closeup of the rocket from underneath it, in which the camera rapidly changes camera angle. However, it would be impossible to get that shot from under a rocket safely. No other footage from such a small angle under a rocket exists like that, for this exact reason.

There is significant camera shaking in the subsequent MORE-ZOOMED OUT CLIP immediately following 1:14-1:26, because that one is real (not CGI). Why is there camera shaking in a clip recorded from a greater distance, but no camera shaking in a clip recorded closer (under the rocket)? Because the 1:14-1:26 clip is CGI.

Look at the clouds and the color of the sky. The clouds in the 1:14-1:26 segment are totally different from the subsequent segment. Again, because it IS CGI.

There’s a TREMENDOUS amount of dangerous disinformation floating around in this sub. And the post I’m referring to one which claims to be “real” is a prime example.

submitted by /u/Crusty_Holes
[link] [comments] 

Read More