So I’m watching this documentary that basically refutes every anecdotal sighting or photograph ever produced, to include the Trent photos from Oregon, and the Rendlesham Forest encounter. However, sightings like these two, plus my other favorites like the Rex Heflin photos and the video of a craft over Hudson Valley, seem very plausible and hard to explain by conventional means.
I only accept a handful of sightings, usually with visual evidence that’s hard to explain. But as the late great Stanton Friedman said, it only takes one validated sighting to prove the phenomenon is real.
Now, as I’m typing this, they’re refuting the Zimbabwe sighting by the schoolchildren. What say all of you?
submitted by /u/introvrt55
[link] [comments]